Star Wars: The Phantom Menace Review (Part 3 of 7)
Top Comments
All Comments (2,528)
-
@bdtiger880 I checked the star wars wiki. It was Dioxis, in reference to Dioxin, an actual poison used in pesticides.
-
Amen
-
Whats wrong with your faaaaaccce?
-
@jollyroger475 Well, you're basing his reaction to nitpicking a new Hope on assumptions, which often prove to be incorrect. Also, if you found yourself in possession of the most advanced military technology science had to offer, and you were capable of destroying a whole planet with it, do you think you'd ask if it had a weak spot?
-
"how bout a night in Megan's foxhole?"
sigh, they missed a golden buisiness opportunity...
-
I can't understand why you would enjoy the original trilogy if the illogical plot and sub-plot aspects in star wars seem to irritate u so much. I'm sure you'd rush to defend A New Hope if someone made a clip, pointing out the glaring idiocy of the death star's "weak spot". I think you need to explain your obvious double-standards. It seems that the original trilogy has some sort of nostaligic immunity when it comes to criticism. By the way, I do very much agree with you about the main plot flaws
-
how about money&lots of the people have machines in on them.a guy in could city.thay whated rescue the he queen.thay do,nt control were the bod landen so have to get help geting to the captal of the planet witch is being invaden all over
@CM377106
Its called a MOVIE review, no one cares about the books because no one should read extra books to understand a bad movie.
Szgerle 3 weeks ago 99
@TheBluntNinja Congratulations. You actually got the joke. And just in case you missed it before, the Cuban crisis wasn't called World War I either.
kragary 2 weeks ago 42