Panel Discussion 11/11 (The Amazing Meeting 2)

The Panel Discussion from the Amazing Meeting 2 in Las Vegas. The Panel consists of James Randi, Phil Plait, Hervey Peoples, Bob Park, Michael Shermer, Steve Berret, Eugenie Scott, Penn & Teller

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• tam
• jref
• james
• randi
• penn
• teller
• michael
• shermer
• eugenie
• sco

[KingLoser66]

Thanks for uploading this.

Great panel discussing important topics.

[Komojo]

This was great. These videos don't have nearly enough views.

[anonynaw]

@Birgeyful I realize that you have posted this a year ago, BUT. You SHOULD be wrapping your mind around the entire point of it all. Not a few silly coincidences.

[Birgeyful]

google:

"33 Conspiracy Theories That Turned Out To Be True"

if JREF'ers had existed when those theories where around, they would have denied them all....

sorry, they still deny them, lol

[Birgeyful]

JREF'ers denies everything that does not fit into the official story, that is not skepticism. That is ignorance.

[Josh111485]

TAM is very important. The JREF, The Skeptic Society, The New England Skeptical Society, and all other notable skeptical organizations. I have now joined an organization called New York City Skeptics and I feel more at home with skepticism and this organization than anything. Even more than actors and comedians, which is the career path I've chosen. Join your local skeptic organization or start a meet-up group and fight the good fight like this brilliant panel.

[DelusionOrReality]

The science community need to charge royalties on each development or discovery, not for the individuals but so a properly funded public relations, news and documentaries network can start to get facts delivered into mainstream viewing and prime time, to undermine the lies and misdirection of religion and the other deceivers. Thank you for uploading this series.

[mccote]

contaminate mars with life? thats interesting.

[CrashGames2108]

I was beginning to think I was the only one who watched the whole series with the apperent lack of comments on the last few videos.

[twold4this]

I agree on both your points; the lack of views is a little scary...or perhaps it is a good reminder that there are relatively few 'hard core' skeptics who would want to watch 'this kind of thing' and this knowledge can help keep the skeptical movement 'grounded' (oops, sorry about using that awful expression!)

[shraleina]

To quote Mr Burns: "Excellent!"