Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

For Bush's Amusement

Rep. Pete Stark has been ridiculed over his statements about Bush and the Iraq War. How amused is Bush over the war?  
 
Customize

More From: crooksandliars

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
117 ratings
Sign in to rate
25,170 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (2)

Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (105)   Options

Loading...
amandaellison2 (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
rofl I sometimes wonder what it?d be like to have a big wang fixing my hard drive lol
laural360s (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I love this videos getup. Kind of like me in my pictures
nonnocere1980 (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
haha (but it's really not funny)... we need someone in office that really cares about the people of this country! Any suggestions?
ndchriste (2 years ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I disagree with Stark. It wasn't for the president's amusement, it was for his ego. George Bush has his head up is rear-end and refuses to pull the troops out because he wants to prove that he was right when he was really wrong and the Dems the Reps and all the politicians who vote to fund are complicit in this.
Pelius1221 (2 years ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
Clearly! It would not make sense to those that make up "rules". Thus, my words noted ring true..again.
Perspective: Which groups protest more, bash America more, provide statements that are un-provable more, have a harder time making hard decisions?
Blame not one who has provided facts, philosophy, and focus to a (your) lack of comprehension.
Brandt761 (2 years ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
No, I mean what you're saying is not grammatically complete...which statement infers service, loyalty and respect? This has nothing to do with my ignorance. I guess the sentence in the middle is just gramatically weird and I shouldn't be a hard-on about it but still.
If anyone is bashing anything, it is you, bashing liberals in general. I was only pointing ou that whatever your point is was probably not coming across. You immediately assumed I was against you and bashing America.
Pelius1221 (2 years ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
Root-cause-analysis. "9/11 inside job = controlled demolition and building..bush blew up the towers..get over your patriotism" AND "As a rule, actually, liberals are the more informed and less angr"
Clearly you lack focus AND comprehension.
(Chuckles) pointless, ill-informed liberals.
Brandt761 (2 years ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Oh, sorry, patriotism is a word, not a statement. Liberals are so damn pointless, yes. Abolishing slavery, the New Deal, winnning World War II /(republicans were against the war), desegregation, all those things were so pointless and ill-informed.
Pray tell me, what am I uninformed about, huh?
Pelius1221 (2 years ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
Abe Lincoln freed the slaves, Republican.
WWII victory you say..GOP was against the war, until attacked. Humm, kind of like current events, no?
Dr. M.L. King changed the nation, Republican.
Miserablly pointless, ill-informed liberals.
What are you, 12?! (Chuckles)
Pelius1221 (2 years ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
Clearly! It would not make sense to those that make up "rules". Thus, my words noted ring true..again.
Perspective: Which groups protest, bash America, provide statements that are un-provable, and have a harder time making hard decisions?
Blame not one who has provided facts, philosophy, and focus to a (your) lack of comprehension.
Sad.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.