Rebuttal assumes that both parties are interested in real debate. You, however, operate only at the level of sound bites. (Your childish and repeated use of "sozialist" being a good example.) You may not watch FOX News, but you should. There, and on the am dial, you will find your kindred spirits.
You, sir, are either very young or very foolish (though I suspect both, so perhaps it will pass). Only someone young and foolish would believe that publication in physics makes him some kind of expert in history; it is a subject whose intricacies clearly elude you.
Hitler's economic policy (as any well-informed college freshman will tell you) was neomercantilist. But that appears to be too big a term for you to comprehend. I had mistakenly assumed that this was an academic discussion. I see that I have stumbled on FOX News where I least expected to find it. Sad days indeed.
No, Z. Taynor, your denial of the obvious historical fact that Hitler was a 100% sozialist demonstrates inability to comprehend reality.
Just off the top of my head, please refer to the NYTimes article by David Leonhardt on 31March2009 in the business section "Stimulus Thinking, and Nuance".
Here is another one:
If Hitler was not a socialist, then what word best describes his economic policy and the policy of his nazi (National Sozialist) government)?
you wish you could say the same about your moms punk!
duronski 2 years ago
Thank you for reaffirming my point.
zebediahtaynor 2 years ago
Yes, another nazional sozialist coward slinks away from debate....
scottfunkhouser 2 years ago
Rebuttal assumes that both parties are interested in real debate. You, however, operate only at the level of sound bites. (Your childish and repeated use of "sozialist" being a good example.) You may not watch FOX News, but you should. There, and on the am dial, you will find your kindred spirits.
zebediahtaynor 2 years ago
My physics cred's were listed to show the foolishness of your insults against my intelligence.
I note that you did not provide any rebut to my point.
That is not surprising since my points were correct.
Good riddance...
scottfunkhouser 2 years ago
You, sir, are either very young or very foolish (though I suspect both, so perhaps it will pass). Only someone young and foolish would believe that publication in physics makes him some kind of expert in history; it is a subject whose intricacies clearly elude you.
Get back to me when you grow up.
Best,
Z. Taynor
zebediahtaynor 2 years ago
"Quack-nut claims" is libelous and I intend to pursue legal action against you. What an idiot you are.
miguellaosantina 2 years ago
No Mr. Funkhouser.
Hitler's economic policy (as any well-informed college freshman will tell you) was neomercantilist. But that appears to be too big a term for you to comprehend. I had mistakenly assumed that this was an academic discussion. I see that I have stumbled on FOX News where I least expected to find it. Sad days indeed.
Z. Taynor
zebediahtaynor 2 years ago
No, Z. Taynor, your denial of the obvious historical fact that Hitler was a 100% sozialist demonstrates inability to comprehend reality.
Just off the top of my head, please refer to the NYTimes article by David Leonhardt on 31March2009 in the business section "Stimulus Thinking, and Nuance".
Here is another one:
If Hitler was not a socialist, then what word best describes his economic policy and the policy of his nazi (National Sozialist) government)?
scottfunkhouser 2 years ago
????
I tried to erase nothing. I have no regrets about my comments. Your quack-nut claims simply confirm what I think.
scottfunkhouser 2 years ago