mY PITBULL

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,511
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 10, 2009

THIS IS MY PITBULL U CAN SEE HIM BECOUSE I RECORDED HIM SI WATCH HIM AND ENJOY!!!!=)))))Pitbulls and other breeds such as Rottweilers must be muzzled and leashed in public and the owners must pay an annual fee for any injuries caused by these dogs.This includes any Pit Bull born within 90 days of August 29, 2005. Anyone who does not own a Pit Bull past August 29, 2005 are allowed to obtain no more than one grandfathered Pit Bull (by gift). All grandfathered Pit Bulls of over 36 weeks of age are required to be sterilized immediately. Grandfathered Pit Bulls must be muzzled and leashed on a leash of less than 1.8 metres while in public. Compliance of said terms were to be completed within 60 days of August 29, 2005. Sale of non-grandfathered Pit Bulls to residents of Ontario is illegal.The Supreme Court rejected each of these claims. It found that Pit Bull owners as a class were not constitutionally suspect when identified in a statute (as opposed to race, ethnicity, and natural origin). Furthermore, the ownership of an animal was not a fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution, but a liberty interest to be safeguarded. Consequently, the court required only a rational basis test for the constitutionality of the ordinance. It held that state police power held a "significant state interest" in public safety and welfare, and that regulation of dogs was a proper exercise of that power.[53] The court adopted the trial court findings that, "Pit Bull attacks, unlike attacks by other dogs, occur more often, are more severe, and are more likely to result in fatalities. The trial court also found that Pit Bulls tend to be stronger than other dogs, often give no warning signals before attacking, and are less willing than other dogs to retreat from an attack, even when they are in considerable pain."[54] However, the court did not cite any scientific sources for this legal conclusion.

The Supreme Court did affirm the lower court's ruling that the burden should fall to the state in proving whether an owner's dog was a "Pit Bull" for purposes of the ordinance. Given the case's federal citations for due process claims, this is particularly significant to those statutes of other states which place the burden on the owner in contrast to the Colorado ruling. Pit Bull owners facing prosecution who hold the burden of proof for their dog could challenge the statute on due process grounds under the reasoning in Colorado Dog Fanciers.

The Colorado case did not address expert findings that specific breeds should not be banned from municipalities. Other jurisdictions have deferred the weighing of scientific evidence to the legislature, but do not accept expert testimony to the contrary if the legislature has a "rational basis for public health and safety."[55]

Subsequent to this ruling, a 2004 law passed by the Colorado General Assembly now prohibits breed specific laws. The city of Denver challenged the law on the basis of home rule wherein the city's charter could supersede state law if the issue was to be considered as "local" as opposed to that of a mixed concern, or statewide concern. The district court (not the Colorado Supreme Court) said that there was no new evidence to change its ruling on the Dog Fancier's Case and that it was a local issue. The court refused to allow evidence in which was given to the Colorado Legislature when they passed HB 04-1279 previously. Therefore, the Denver ordinance was reinstated. Over 260 "Pit Bull type" dogs have been seized from their homes and euthanised since this date, resulting in national protest by dog owners and animal rights lobbying groups.[56] Since 1989, Denver authorities have confiscated and destroyed over 1100 Pit Bulls from city residents who have violated the ordinance. Dog owners continue to bring Pit Bulls into the city.

No such ban on other dogs deemed dangerous has been enacted.

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (kolec707)

  • in this vide its pupy..7 moth old

  • hahaha

see all

All Comments (9)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The best breed EVER. Don't listen to the people who are saying he's too skinny. He'll fill out.

  • its too skinny man...

  • and thats not a pit pedigree its crossed with an english bull terrier... i had one myself ;)

  • PEOPLE WHO RAISE PITBULS FOR FIGHTING, NEED THEIR DOGS TO RIP THEIR THROAT OFF IN THER SLEEP, AND WITH A FIGHT BEFORE IT KILLS THEM, AND I HOPE THE DOGS WIN!!!! eye f the tiger my ass... assholes!!!

  • i love my pitbull

  • zasto se slikas ???sto si tako fotogenican!?

  • hhahhahahhahahahahha

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more