Part 2 of 7 - The Fossil Record, Dr. Don Patton, Ph.D.

The fossil record is supposed to be the primary documentary evidence for evolution. If there is proof, it would have to be from the fossils. Dr. Patton examines the evidence as described by the leading paleontologists themselves and demonstrates that the supposed proof is very much against evolution.
For more information, visit http://www.bible.ca/tracks/videos-quotes.htm

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Don
• Patton
• fossil
• record
• evolution
• versus
• creation

[stratocaster539]

What kind of Phd produced this garbage? Not a genuine one obviously!

[wizard970]

@gregrutz His PHD is in Christian Education from Pacific Collage of Graduate Studies (Luther Rice Universities). It is not accredited or authorized by any local or national board to grant degrees.

[gregrutz]

@kg4bga Religion is defined as a dogma and rituals that centers around the belief in the supernatural, a deity or both.

Science does not use the supernatural or a deity.

Therefore, logic follows> this might be new to you, Science is not a Religion.

Nothing in Science is based on Faith.

[gregrutz]

@kg4bga ''Show me one rock come alive'' Strawman argument. No one says we came from rock except creationists.

''Evolution says everything is changing'' No, just species are evolving. Uniformitarianism says process are the same today and yesterday. The laws of nature do no change.

''except it has always been this way'' And it will stay that way.

[kg4bga]

Show me one rock come alive. I don't think so. you have to use the Biblical view for science to even work. Evolution says everything is changing. If that is true then the results of science experiments would change to. You have NO bases to say that a science experiments you did today will give you the same results as yesterday except it has always been this way, unless there is a supreme ruler. I know you will not understand that right now, but think about it, You will see i am right.

[TheLostGuitarist]

@kg4bga faith = belief with no evidence.

faith =/= belief without actually seeing something

I don't need faith to know electrons exist even though I can't physically see them. That's what science is...measuring things we can't physically see, using evidence to make educated inferences and predictions which lead to theories and models of how the world works

go finish your GED and you may understand that some day

[TheLostGuitarist]

@kg4bga huh? I can see the fossil record....I can see evolution in a lab (see pubmed articles on speciation events both bacterial and plant), and what does that have to do with an "explosion" 4.6 billion years ago....big bang theory=/= evolutionary theory

that is the problem with you silly creationists, you have no scientific education and don't know anything about what you are arguing.

Oh well I'm off to learn how to save lives (I'm in medical school), keep praying kid

[kg4bga]

@TheLostGuitarist You were not there to see it. You can't make it happen in a lab. you can not show pictures of it. you have no proof that there was an explosion 4.6 billion years ago. that is something that you have to believe happened. there is your faith.

[TheLostGuitarist]

@kg4bga for instance, explain what part of the papers on comparative molecular genetics are faith based. If you don't know what comparative molecular genetics is, it is the most current and complete evidence of evolutionary theory's validity.

[TheLostGuitarist]

@kg4bga Evolution is not a religious view. There is not one part of evolutionary theory based on faith. Tell me exactly what diagram, and what dataset from exactly what peer reviewed scientific journal article on evolutionary theory is faith based.

You don't need a PhD to understand something, this man is trying to use his credentials to imply he is holds some sort of academic authority on the subject. He, as well as you don't seem to understand what evolutionary theory is...