Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Senator Lee Argues Against Indefinite Detention of Detained American Citizens

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,301
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 30, 2011

Senator Lee Argues Against Indefinite Detention of Detained American Citizens

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (33)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Endorse Ron Paul sir!!! Please!!! Do it for America!!!!

  • @dertbag2222 No he did not, apparently you don't get how it works, he did not vote for the Udall Amdt because it allowed the clause and he sponsored an amended version in the Feinstein Amdt which clarified that clause to NOT allow the Military to detain American Citizens. The final bill HR 1540 did not contain the Feinstein Amdt clause so he did NOT vote for it, in fact he was one of the few Senators that did NOT vote for it because he stays aware of the constitutional issues.

  • @2Bonita08 ...no your internet connection just sucks.

  • Mr. Lee, you are a man of courage and backbone. Thank you for speaking so clearly and factually about upholding your oath to uphold and defend the Constitution.

  • Strange that this video is not downloading, it keeps pausing...wow. Free speech is nearly dead on all fronts.

  • @dertbag2222 Here are the votes.

    Dec 1, 2011 6:08 PM

    Yea

    Feinstein Amdt. No. 1126

    Amendment Rejected 45-55

    Dec 1, 2011 2:02 PM

    Yea

    Feinstein Amdt. No. 1125

    Amendment Rejected 45-55

  • @dertbag2222 The final bill has not been voted on yet.

  • My previous statement was not completely correct. The Senator still has the chance to vote for the Feinstein amendment today that will not allow for indefinite detainment. Lets hope you do the right thing today Senator. Put your money where your mouth is.

  • If i understand him right, he voted Tues against the Udall amend. because it didn't go far enough. But today, when the senate votes on the bill itself, he's saying no? I hope so.

  • All this talk means nothing if he voted 'Yes' finally.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more