Massive damage to the back of the head

This video points to critical frames in the Zapruder film in which it is easy to see massive damage to the back of President Kennedy's head. It also addresses the ridiculous argument this is an illusion caused by Mrs. Kennedy's hand.

Most importantly, this damage was not present during the terrible explosion at frame 313, or for some time afterward. It could only have been the result of a second head shot.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• JFK
• assassination
• zapruder
• film
• conspiracy

[SaintlyOswald]

@SaintlyOswald What I'm seeing frame to frame seems to disappear in a stabilized and centered video of the sequence. Maybe it's just a trick of angles and camera motion.

[SaintlyOswald]

@SaintlyOswald 333 zooms out. 334 goes by. 335 zooms out again. And then it looks normal again. 337 and 339 also zoom out a bit. It's as if it's being eased out from having been zoomed to be cropped in the "kill zone." 341 and 350, on my version at least, have some clumsy-looking fill on the side of the car, and 345 has a strange bottom frame edge.

[SaintlyOswald]

The Z film gets really weird around the head shot. First, the limo is at the extreme bottom of the frame at this critical time. Then at 331 the President's head gets very distorted while the rest of the foreground is moderately distorted and the background hardly at all. At 332 the car lurches back into the frame, presumably because of camera shake. Then at 333 the picture zooms out and it's not just the motion of the car, the background recedes, too. Look at the two guys on the grass.

[gorrionalvuelo]

Bob please answer me this question: so are you saying that they were thwo headshots?

[Eidelmania]

@BlueWolfe38 you be shillin'

[homebuiltindoorplane]

@BlueWolfe38 LOL drink that Kool Aid, boy!

[conspiracydog11]

@asgerwille I hope you had a good trip, the U.S. is big and diverse. I am from a little town in the Western North Carolina mountains. It is a beautiful place but hard to make a living. I still live in NC but in a little more affluent part of the state. I have studied a lot of history on my own but some from a Erich von Däniken point of view. Pumapunku comes to mind.

[asgerwille]

@conspiracydog11 Hi again! Sorry, I've been snowed under for some days now - with work, not literally ;)

I drove across the states last year - from N.Y. to SF - and spent some time in the southern part. May I ask which state you are from? It's lovely to hear, that things worked out even if you may have begun your life in conditions that didn't make education easy. You have obviously read in to this subject. Have you ever studied history - perhaps in evening school (does that make sense?)

[jvs257]

I submit at frame 337 You can see Jackie looking into the wound, as she herself described.

[conspiracydog11]

@asgerwille I had an idea you were a teacher. I actually love history but being from a poor part of the South I was lucky I was able to finish high school, although I did find a wonderful partner and we have done rather well.

Spartacus Educational has a great section on JFK and Tippit who I think should have had his life looked into more closely by the Warren Commission.