Julia Kristeva - On Linguistics
Top Comments
All Comments (216)
-
looking back on what i wrote a year ago, that i'd quite forgotton except for your potty gob comments, It is pretty good though isn't it? Thanks for reminding me. You should take note and learn instead of succombing to infantile convulsions, a nasty, anti social habit that will almost certainly condemn you to failure and despondancy should you reach maturity.
-
You inhabit a different plane of existence. I prefer Dawkins' succinct analysis of fruitcakes like Julia:
"Suppose you are an intellectual impostor with nothing to say, but with strong ambitions to succeed in academic life, collect a coterie of reverent disciples and have students around the world anoint your pages with respectful yellow highlighter. What kind of literary style would you cultivate? Not a lucid one, surely, for clarity would expose your lack of content."
-
@menacetohighsociety Shut your mouth and give your arsehole a chance. Why do you complain that he is dismissive of worthless shit?
-
@naposletku100 "you live in the pre-Oedipal state. You don’t use language and depend on your mother. But you communicate via the music, rhythm and bodily dependency."
Ha ha ha! Stop wasting your life on this worthless shit!
-
@ILoveElena864 You had a very difficult relationship with your mother, right? =)
-
shes a cute thinker, like very soft. instead of no im right its POWER RAPE THE CHILRDREN IM FAUCOULT.
-
A real piece of incomprehensible crap
-
watch?v=CuQHSKLXu2c#at=991
I can summarize her in 500 characters.
There are two periods in human life.
0-2 years - you live in the pre-Oedipal state. You don’t use language and depend on your mother. But you communicate via the music, rhythm and bodily dependency. A lot of poets use this pre-lingual potential, and that makes their work beautiful
After 2, you start to use language, and enter the institutions. They eventually makes you a boring dude who insists everything should be summarized to 500 characters.
naposletku100 1 year ago 29
@ILoveElena864 if you weren't such a lazy, irritable and partisan scholar, you would discover that your obsessive need to dismiss Kristiva as `shit' denotes you as a classic `Abjectifyer' - Somebody, for example, who finds the existence of the Duck billed platypus deeply offensive, taxonomically speaking. The fact, is you cannot deal with Kristeva objectively at all, can you? only Abjectively, dismissively, brutishly, without patience or sympathy but worst of all, without rationality.
menacetohighsociety 1 year ago 3