Kraftwerk: Radioactivity (No Nukes 2012, Tokio, Japan)

Geiger Counter & Radioactivity @ NO NUKES, Makuhari Messe, Tokio, Japan, 2012/07/07

• Category

  Music

[whisperer istmich]

Kraftwerk is just immortal!. its 2013 and they just seem to be getting better and better!

[MissReibot]

Fukushima, in referece to the reactors that malfunctioned in 2011.

[Joe Yap]

WHY THE FUCK JAPAN GETS THE BEST LIVE IN THE WORLD. EVERYTIME!!!?!?!??!!?!?

WHY?!?!?!

[Sam Gates]

AGREE ;)

[fjh1616]

You replied to your own comment. Wow.

[TheBorrany1]

:-)) Internet in North Korea? ;-)

[Gergely Attila Sándor]

Radioactive waste isn't uncontrollable. We have and use the technology to controll it. There are a huge difference between a nuke and a fission reactor, the second can't explode as a nuke. Also, if you produce power whit a TPP, air pollution will increase, and it caused the death of more peoploe than radioactivity. Also notable, that Japan is the seismically most active part of the world, and it is nonsense, to build nuclear power plants there. (sorry for my bad spelling, i'm not English)

[pandorino666]

"during hundreds of thousands years", sorry. Seriously. You lack any knowledge about how the nuclear energy is being handled. And I can assure you that the radioactivity will least longer that the corporations that are handling it right now for their economic profit. Don't you feel responsible about the future of your grandsons?

[pandorino666]

No Hanford nuclear waste leaks for you? No plans to build a nuclear waste repository deep in Yucca Mountain? No 71,862 tons of waste housed in the pools of the US reactors, growing and waiting for a permanent storage and increasing the risk of accident? Anyway, there is no material way to contain plutonium waste for more than 100 years in the same place and it's lethal during hundreds of years. We're just buying time and killing our grandsons. Troll about other things less dangerous.

[Florian Flobius]

It sadly is indeed the most efficient energy source we have yet. It even is pretty ecological since there is no gas emission or human errors/natural accidents like the Sendai tsunami issue.

There is nothing more efficient in term of efficiency, and we'll have to deal with it until we master hydrogen fission.

But we can't say the waste isn't poured in random places. Some nuclear power plant owners don't care about the casualties due to the waste, they wouldn't live long enough to see them.

[Vranabg]

youre implying that the waste from reactors is not actually a semi re-usable fuel with multiple life cycles and is just poured onto penguins and ducks for the 'lulz''. It is far from a dirty source of anti-ecologic energy but it is something the common idiot like you enjoys fearing and smearing because of your near null understanding of it.

[pedlottohu]

Nagyonmai 40eve a legjobbak között, olasz.