Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Old Earth vs Young Earth Debate - Dr. Hugh Ross & Dr. Kent Hovind (1 of 3)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,569
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 10, 2011

A mesmerizing debate between two men well known in their fields of expertise. This three-DVD set features Dr. Kent Hovind, a staunch young earth creationist, and Dr. Hugh Ross, who believes the earth is billions of years old, but somehow considers himself a creationist. Includes post-debate commentary by James Sundquist, who has done an eight-year study on Ross' teachings, and Dr. Dan Faulkner, Professor of Astronomy at University of South Carolina. http://www.drdino.com

See an analysis of this debate at http://creation.com/rosshovind-debate-john-ankerberg-show-october-2000-analys...

Also see a better debate Ken Ham and astrophysicist Jason Lisle of Answers in Genesis debate Hugh Ross on the John Ankerberg show here: http://www.answersingenesis.org/media#/video/ondemand/great-debate


"Copyright was placed on all Creation Science Evangelism materials (no matter the production date) effective January 1, 2005. PERMISSION IS GIVEN TO DUPLICATE AND DISTRIBUTE OUR PRODUCTS -- within the following guidelines:

1.Materials are to be copied, unedited, unaltered and distributed absolutely free of charge.
2.Under no circumstances are copies of our videos / DVD's / Printed Materials to be sold for any price." - http://www.drdino.com/about-cse/policies/

  • likes, 6 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (slaves4christ)

  • Hovind could have done better in my opinion. 

  • @eagleeye2102 I think Ken Ham & Jason Lisle did a much better job against Hugh Ross. See their debate on my other channel (listed on my channel - I hate that I can't post links here).

    Among other things, I think Hovind didn't get = time with the moderator Ankerberg siding with Ross, he wasn't able use his Powerpoints as he's used to, didn't get a chance to counter a lot of things that were said, and didn't want to talk about the Hebrew much with his devotion to the KJV.

see all

All Comments (20)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Hugh Ross for the WIN! He was much more prepared and professional in his approach, not to mention he never resorts to personal attacks like Mr. Hovind. Ankerburg wasn't biased, just more persuaded by the truth being presented by Dr. Ross.

  • so much for the objectivity...of the scientists....

  • People can argue what the bible says and what evidence they think they have. Only one can be right. Or they are both wrong. This is the point where i say i am not God. I will not question what God said nor will i try to talk like i know what God did.

  • According to Jesuits- they've infiltrated seminaries and colleges throughout North America for the past 2 hundred years to counter the teachings of the reformers to return to sound doctrines (which is why schools were organized in order to learn to read the Bible). They've been successful.It's not a surprise therefore that these kinds of teachings (contrary to a literal 6 days) are in fact being taught for many generations now. To the extreme that we are being lead astray to false doctrine.

  • @Tuliahvoa umm...look at my channel...You can re-post yourself if you do so in a respectable manner.

  • @Tuliahvoa I agree with & appreciate your comments, but I am have a policy of no filthy language allowed in comments on videos I upload, and am removing your comment. Even though you used "##," everyone knows what you mean. This is only the 2nd comment I've removed for this reason by a creationist, compared with thousands by atheists/evolutionists.

  • Ross should have never stepped into this. And to claim that we have seen the end of the expanse of the universe will come back and bite'em.

  • He didn't think we were so stupid that we couldn't comprehend time frames? I think God meant it exactly the way he said it, and confirmed that by giving us the passing of time, "evening and morning". if he would have not mentioned that then they may have a case, but that is the jewish day.

  • Dig out sand, insert head. Good work Dr. Hovind.

  • I don't think the host is biased against either position; he's just trying to prevent Kent from acting judgmental and stating if you don't believe man walked with dinosaurs you're not a Christian. 

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more