Old Earth vs Young Earth Debate - Dr. Hugh Ross & Dr. Kent Hovind (1 of 3)
Uploader Comments (slaves4christ)
Video Responses
All Comments (20)
-
Hugh Ross for the WIN! He was much more prepared and professional in his approach, not to mention he never resorts to personal attacks like Mr. Hovind. Ankerburg wasn't biased, just more persuaded by the truth being presented by Dr. Ross.
-
so much for the objectivity...of the scientists....
-
People can argue what the bible says and what evidence they think they have. Only one can be right. Or they are both wrong. This is the point where i say i am not God. I will not question what God said nor will i try to talk like i know what God did.
-
According to Jesuits- they've infiltrated seminaries and colleges throughout North America for the past 2 hundred years to counter the teachings of the reformers to return to sound doctrines (which is why schools were organized in order to learn to read the Bible). They've been successful.It's not a surprise therefore that these kinds of teachings (contrary to a literal 6 days) are in fact being taught for many generations now. To the extreme that we are being lead astray to false doctrine.
-
@Tuliahvoa umm...look at my channel...You can re-post yourself if you do so in a respectable manner.
-
@Tuliahvoa I agree with & appreciate your comments, but I am have a policy of no filthy language allowed in comments on videos I upload, and am removing your comment. Even though you used "##," everyone knows what you mean. This is only the 2nd comment I've removed for this reason by a creationist, compared with thousands by atheists/evolutionists.
-
Ross should have never stepped into this. And to claim that we have seen the end of the expanse of the universe will come back and bite'em.
-
He didn't think we were so stupid that we couldn't comprehend time frames? I think God meant it exactly the way he said it, and confirmed that by giving us the passing of time, "evening and morning". if he would have not mentioned that then they may have a case, but that is the jewish day.
-
Dig out sand, insert head. Good work Dr. Hovind.
-
I don't think the host is biased against either position; he's just trying to prevent Kent from acting judgmental and stating if you don't believe man walked with dinosaurs you're not a Christian.
Hovind could have done better in my opinion.
eagleeye2102 10 months ago
@eagleeye2102 I think Ken Ham & Jason Lisle did a much better job against Hugh Ross. See their debate on my other channel (listed on my channel - I hate that I can't post links here).
Among other things, I think Hovind didn't get = time with the moderator Ankerberg siding with Ross, he wasn't able use his Powerpoints as he's used to, didn't get a chance to counter a lot of things that were said, and didn't want to talk about the Hebrew much with his devotion to the KJV.
slaves4christ 9 months ago