Left 4 Dead 2 Review - HD

The sequel to Left 4 Dead. How does it stack up against the first?

Category:

Gaming

Tags:

• left
• dead
• valve
• review
• video
• game
• high
• definition
• coach
• ellis
• nick
• rochelle
• toxinarrow

[ToxinArrow]

@Ghost0530 I don't care anymore. You're nothing but an idiot who can't accept other people's opinions. You've continually tried to tell me how mine is wrong, so I've nothing more to say to you. Go troll elsewhere kthnx.

[Ghost0530]

@ToxinArrow You know why no one else has commented? Because they know that what I am saying right know goes for almost everyone that watches this video. I have now played both games and i can proudly and honestly say you are W-R-O-N-G! Can't spell it out? WRONG! L4D and L4D 2 are amazing games and I'm glad they made the sequel. I just want you to notice people were commenting on your video before I started, and you knew the reason. >=D

[Ghost0530]

@ToxinArrow I haven't played the game, but I know everything about it. I know all the characters and their background, I know ALL the SI, plus the Special Common Infected in L4D2. I know all the weapons, I know just about everything about the games, without even playing them. I probably know more than you do. Also, you and me both know that this argument/debate is no where NEAR over. And i also spell out OK, and that's the way we spell eleck from where I'm from, know-nothing.

[ToxinArrow]

@Ghost0530 "OH! SMART ELECK REMARK! " No that's spelling wrong.

A few months after the game is hardly too late.

LOL you don't even have the game and you're trying to tell me I'm wrong? K I'm done with you now troll. This discussion was amusing to say the least.

[Ghost0530]

@ToxinArrow I didn't spell anything wrong. Ths is splling rong. The reason such a short time is because they came up with improvements, but they came up with them too late. So they had to start making the new game. BTW, tonight I'm getting the L4D BUNDLE for $29.99 and I will play both and PROVE that creating a new game was better.

[ToxinArrow]

@Ghost0530 Boycotters. And exactly, such a short time to start planning the next game. Why? they didn't have to make the game. Have you been reading anything I've said?

Also, if you're going to try an insult me, you can at least spell right. Otherwise it just makes you look even more retarded.

[Ghost0530]

@ToxinArrow First off, whose we? Secondly, you have know idea how releasing works. They had finished L4D1 whenever they started planning L4D2, but they couldn't go back because they had already announced the release date. THAT's why it was a short time. I know this because I actually research things instead of whining about stuff I don't even know. OH! SMART ELECK REMARK! What now?

[ToxinArrow]

@Ghost0530 And how do you know they won't? Can you prove it? I'm sure everyone said that about Call of Duty, or 90% of EA titles. And before you get all smartassy again, I can't prove they will end up doing this. But the fact that this atrocity happened is proof enough that Valve is slipping. Literally not even a year after the first. They've never dumped a game that quick. And we're trying to make sure it doesn't happen again.

[Ghost0530]

@ToxinArrow That's my point, they WON'T. Look at every series Valve has made. CS, TF, HL, DoD. I've never played Day of Defeat, but I have played the others. They change things, and thats why they have released HL 2: Episode 3 yet, they making it ten times better than the others.

[ToxinArrow]

@Ghost0530 "With all work put into the patches, you might as well make a new game. " This is exactly the kind of thing we DON'T want Valve to think, because then you get yearly garbage games that do nothing to improve the game, or push gaming as a genre of art forward as a whole. Look at every sports game, or Call of Duty, fuck look at APPLE!. The same thing copy pasted year in, year out. It's a horrible model to go with if they want the support of the people who buy their products...