Thermite Conspiracy (dprjones mirror)
Loading...
Loading...
3:42
RE: Debunk This! 008 ( 911 Conspiracy )by theNWOman540 views- 8:26
Defusing Nanothermite: Integrityby deRoyLight6,932 views
- 2:42
Explosives don't pulverize concreteby KJC24329 views
- 10:42
The WTC7 Conspiracyby dprjones33,195 views
- 10:18
Mirror's Edge 09 - Conspiracy Theoryby HyperbolicBubble94 views
- 9:58
WTC Free Fall Rebuttal to dprjonesby stoobradley2,198 views
- 9:59
National Geographic Science & Conspiracy Part 1by KJC2427,800 views
- 6:48
Chomsky dispels 9/11 conspiracies with sheer logicby dailybackground549,335 views
- 6:25
9/11 Debunking for Dummiesby Steeper335,028 views
- 1:53
9/11 Debunked: Columns Cut not by Thermiteby RKOwens489,996 views
- 6:16
911 Case Study: Pentagon Flight 77by mikejwilson3,656,454 views
- 2:34
9/11 PENTAGON ATTACK - WITNESSby 72150839,676 views
- 1:45
9/11 PENTAGON ATTACK - INDEPENDENT ANALYSISby 721508293,101 views
- 0:51
Top-Down building collapse 2by AlienEntity1158,738 views
- 1:56
9/11 Conspiracy theorist gets schooledby bryankelly35,880 views
- 1:17
Smoking Guns Debunked correctionby AlienEntity1459 views
- 6:42
9/11 Truth Movement, please go awayby JustanotherNobody1226,522 views
- 0:05
dumb ass catby joshuafunnyshit105,287 views
- 4:01
New collapse footage of WTC7 and North Tower - Nov 2008by corbettreport186,146 views
- 2:36
Danny Jowenko on WTC 7 controlled demolitionby MasterpieceConCen63,234 views
The findings of the addressed paper have btw been confirmed by a French scientist who still believes in the official conspiracy theory that 'Muslims did 9/11':
Frédéric Henry-Couannier: "Red-red chips having almost all the properties announced by S Jones and co do exist in the WTC dust. Their abundance and the numerous metallic microspheres i could see [...]”
RummelsdorfLabs 4 months ago
The way the author of this video starts off with argumentum ad hominem shows, that he has little understanding of how the scientific method works. Even if the nanothermite paper was published on toilet paper, it would not harm the well-done scientific research it contains. Its formalities get attacked because the arguments it contains are sound. Anyone who decides (like the author of this video) not to address the contents of the published paper is obviously no proper scientist.
RummelsdorfLabs 4 months ago