Ichtyostega: The death of creative licence - http://home.comcast.net/~internationalhero/icthyostega/icthyostega1.htm July 30,2007
"The facts of microevolution [change within the species] do not suffice for an understanding of macroevolution [theorized change from one species to another]." *Richard Goldschmidt, Materal Basis of Evolution (1940).
"All in all, evolution remains almost as much of a puzzle as it was before Darwin advanced his thesis. Natural selection explains a small part of what occures: the bulk remains unexplained. Darwinism is not so much a theory, as a sub-section of some theory as yet unformulated.. I for one..am still at a loss to know why it is of selective advantage for eels of Comacchio to travel perilously to the Sargasso sea..'complains Bertalanffy. ' I think the fact that a theory so vague, so insufficiently verifiable..has become a dogma that can only be explained on sociological [not scientific] grounds, 'von Bertalanffy concludes." *G.R. Taylor, Great Evolution Mystrey (1938). pp. 232-233.
The Blind Gunman - http://icr.org/article/437 .
Mutation Fixation: A Dead End for Macro-evolution - http://icr.org/article/270 .
Can the Small Changes We See Add Up to the Big Changes Needed for Evolution? - http://icr.org/article/538 .
Quotes by Evolutionary Scientists Against Evolution - http://www.warneveryone.com/evolution_scientists_quotes.htm
Live broadcasting with instant message - http://www.justin.tv/warneveryone
KJV1611 Bible - http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=authorizedversion&search=Search
The Institute for Creation Research equips believers with evidences of the Bible's accuracy and authority through scientific research, educational programs, and media presentations, all conducted within a thoroughly biblical framework.
info@icr.org
http://www.icr.org
brilliant video
TheSpikeystuff 6 days ago
good work here
MrJonkelp 6 days ago
@ledz2032 again, basically I am saying that everything you said is true, except the devolution. All of your arguments are in fact taught in any well written book about evolution.
ledz2032 1 week ago
@ledz2032 first sentence was confusing, i think faster than I can type sometimes. Clarifying: It is true that most mutations do not benefit the species at all and usually have the opposite effect, but they die off. The ones that are beneficial survive through natural selection.
ledz2032 1 week ago
@oceanistoosmall My argument is that nothing is totally beneficial. No species have a "totally beneficial" mutation, and it is true that a lot, if not most are in fact not at all, but the ones that may be slightly are the ones that survive. The others die off. Your argument that some mutations cause ill effects, though it may be true in some ways, doesn't matter to survival and is a moot point. I.E.: having fins and gills means you cant walk and breath on land. but is that really an ill effect?
ledz2032 1 week ago
@makarr01 You cite Kettlewells research. His research has been completely debunked. His research has been invalidated and examples of fraud exposed. His moths were dead and he glued them to trees. Yet further proof of that evo-tards need lies for their fake theory to work. If evolution is valid why cite an example that has been disproved. Probably because you can't. What is scary is this has been known for years yet science texts still parrot out lies.
philackey 1 week ago
@ledz2032 Now what the hell is your point? are you smoking?
oceanistoosmall 1 week ago
@oceanistoosmall Having hands means you cant fly. Ill effect. Having fins means you cant walk, ill effect? What the hell is your point, if you can do one thing you can usually not do the other. Great argument.
ledz2032 2 weeks ago
in nature all the mutations we know of produce harmful effects according to that quack, please explain the observed mutation in that species of moth during the industrial revolution that was observed to change from white to grey to adapt better when on the soot covered buildings...
makarr01 2 months ago
Nylon eating bacteria.
TheMrgoku1985 2 months ago