Michigan Republicans Show Their True Colors.

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,202
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 5, 2011

I generally try to not let my emotions rule my videos, but in this case I just couldn't help it. I had a really hard time keeping the language clean, but I didn't think it would help the cause if I started dropping f-bombs.

There has been almost nothing in the local news about this new law. Fortunately this has gotten quite a bit of attention at the national level.

Michigan republicans need to be stopped. They have wiped their ass with the U.S. Constitution and personal freedoms in this state. This is just one more example of how the republicans want to enforce their personal religious beliefs on the rest of society, and how they don't care one bit for any child once it's been born.

It's time that we end their oppressive government in this state, and the rest of the country.

I will update the description in a few hours with a list of Republicans who voted yes on this bill. Let them know how you feel.

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • i agree - that was really creepy. are they going to add similar religious exceptions for murder, theft and rape?

  • @TheMudbrooker This bill is why I'm in favor of Mussonli term limits. No more recalls, just hangings in the street. Of course, my wife says that I tend to over-react sometimes.

see all

All Comments (92)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The only reason why there exists any criticism regarding this bill, is because there exist particular persons who's thinking is clouded enough to cause their inability to correctly define "bullying"

    Part of the reason why unbelievers often slander Christians by painting them as squared or repressed, is because Christians will most often refrain from fast & loose speech such as, "faggot", "queer-bait", "flamer", "breeders" etc. In fact, that is usually the speech domain of the unbelievers

  • The reality is that Christians are most often careful in selecting their words & prefer to remain proper in their articulation of language

    These are the times of "New Atheists" being outspokenly hostile & militantly intolerant while rationalizing justification from their scientific literacy which postulates that they're biologically composed 100% of millions of retained, accumulated, reproductive defects. However, despite this defectiveness, Christian proselytizing usually remains a gentle act

  • In the latest Bogosity podcast, I make the argument about the law violating the establishment clause.

  • What if I made up a religion where I had to always tell the unfiltered truth and I swore my ass off at my school peers? That would be protected under this law. Freedom from religion people

  • Who would have guessed after ProfMTH's video on the glories of school children having freedom of religious and moral speech and expression that could be easily interpreted as (and often is) bullying, HE doesn't even practice what he preaches.

    HE doesn't like to be called out, pointed out as wrong, especially if you call him names while doing it, even IF it's one's strong moral conviction that he is, and should be called, an idiot.

    Guess not all moral convictions are okay with him.

  • @takebackkean Basically, yeah. According to that language, ANY act of expression you do, so long as it was your firm moral or religious conviction, is immune from that law. If you truly believe in your heart of hearts to deepest recesses of your soul that that little autistic kid is due suffering and torment at your hands by your firm conviction that it's God's will, then Hey, that's okay, you're not trying to be mean; your only doing what you believe is the right and moral thing to do.

  • @decojuicer That was MY opinion of him. I don't know ProfMTH, but from the one video I've seen of his (his response to yours) if THAT is this 'geniuses" GRAND insight into things, and I had to make a judgment about him from that alone, I would most certainly assume he's an idiot. He essentially agrees that ANYTHING one could say, couched as one's moral or religious beliefs, isn't bullying and should be specially protected speech among captive school children. THAT's an idiot.

  • sooo i can just go there and beat the shit out of some one if it is my moral conviction? nice if it is legal i will make sure to do it.

  • @decojuicer Well, you're an idiot, so I guess that makes me a bully now, lol.

  • @EmeraldView He's certainly not an idiot.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more