Review: 2008 Porsche Cayenne
Top Comments
All Comments (18)
-
How do you do a review and not show the inteior?
-
Holy crap that was on steep and sketchy hill! Impressed by that.
-
thats right, well said man.
its worth noting though, that normal MLs have fair offroad skill while ML63 is stripped from its offroad capabilities, while Turbo S more or less retains them - regular Turbo is still better though in terrain.
Cayenne S and ML 500 would be a good comparison too, not so extreme
-
the ml63 has a price advantage over the porsche cayenne turbo s but the materials are finer in the turbo s.
Turbo S - 93%
ML63 AMG - 95%
its ever so close.. pretty much a tie.. the ml63 is just a well-rounded car at a smaller price
but the turbo s has the extremes and is good in all aspects and spectactular in others.. both are stunning
-
porsche has all that, really all options you named cos it's a luxury car too. and i think in this particular case the Merc is sportier and looks much more aggressive (seen the bodykit of ML63?)
-
Well you could really expect a lot from the Mercedes. The Mercedes has standard features like voice command, premium leather seating, high-quality sound system, memory system, etc. it has great handling, ride quality, power, etc.
but the porsche is sportier
all in all, the mercedes is a better build and the better car
-
yep, i think most of them are right, but normal turbo is 5.1 i think
anyway ML63 is Turbo S and X5 M class :)
-
i think u might be referring to the previous generation models.. cuz im almost positive of my acceleration times
cayenne - 7.5
cayenne s - 6.5
cayenne gts - 5.6
cayenne turbo - 4.9
cayenne turbo - 4.7
-
i think ML63 is Turbo S level, actually.
Turbo 0-60 = 5.1 seconds
Turbo S - 4.7 seconds
ML63 - 4.8 seconds. so this is the class, plus of course the X5 M.
-
not a single review of the interior of the car...else it would have been a great review.
nice music in the background
arabiankn8 2 years ago 8
awesome car !!
allihyany 2 years ago 2