Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Debunking creationist claims, part 2

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
491 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (7)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Because it is consistent. If you have different kinds of decaying elements then they will give the same answer if measured correctly. There is obviously always an error rate, but you will find that a variety of tests will all give you more or less the same answer.

  • Awesome!

  • Huh? No, the half-life (decay rate) of each element and isotope has been measured independently.

  • sorry.... what i meant to say was: so we can know the decay rate of one element by comparing it to another?

  • so, we can observe the decay of a different element and call it the same?

  • Well done.

  • Heh, itsekin pidän Canonista.

    Kyllä, parikin videota on tekeillä, tulevat kun ovat valmiita.

  • Meitin kissat tykkää kuunnella tätä kun veli soittaa pianolla. Suloisia karvapalloja...

    Itse videosta; tuleeko näitä lisää?

  • erinomainen musiikin valinta. pachelbels canon d. on kumma että johann pachabel jäi yhden hitin ihmeeksi.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more