This documentary was first broadcast on January 24, 2010, on the National Geographic Channel. It was written/produced/directed by Virginian Chris Lofft. The BFRO advised on the production.
The documentary takes a "Legend Meets Science" approach to some of the best evidence, especially the PGF, rather than the typical documentary approach of mere interviews -- believers vs. skeptics.
It presents a mathematically-based argument establishing the validity of the PGF. Most notable, it has the best animated visuals ever made to explain the determinative anatomical issues that bigfoot researchers have been aware of for years.
The approach and results are certainly not novel. In fact they were squarely based on the prior work of Meldrum and Hajicek over the past few years. The involvement of Bill Munns in this doc helped refine the height estimate of the Patterson creature.
The big lady is 7' 6 1/2" tall.
http://www.bfro.net/news/american_paranormal.asp
Founded in 1995 -- The only scientific research organization exploring the bigfoot/sasquatch mystery.
http://www.bfro.net/
Contact the BFRO : CONTACT@BFRO.NET or Phone (408) 634-BFRO [408-634-2376]
I sort of doubt two guys with a camera in 1967 could think like 21st Century Hollywood special effects experts. And why would they have put breasts on their bigfoot (which is clearly female).
OroborusFMA 3 days ago
I would love to know how the sceptics explain the fact that the proper materials needed were not available in 1967 yet they still believe its suit anyway?
burtcane 1 week ago
@storminator1969 dna of any kind 2.
storminator1969 3 weeks ago
The hollywood story makes the best sence.
storminator1969 3 weeks ago
Fake I will believe it when a body or bones are found.
storminator1969 3 weeks ago
@delweine Skeptics often boast about monumental theories demanding monumental proof. They place that burden on the part of Bigfoot existence proponents. Now, if the Skeptics say that it's a man in an ape costume, shouldn't it only be fair to say: okay, where's the costume? A costume that convincingly conveys realistic muscle mass, height, mammary glands, bulk, and walking patterns. Oh, and I don't think it has anything to do with your 1987 halloween costume.
cqtaylor 3 weeks ago
@cqtaylor where is my costume from halloween 1987? do you know? get the point yet?
delweine 3 weeks ago
@mullinaxbridgett43 watch?v=7N33M7as5Ew
danthman114 1 month ago
@danthman114 his story has been proven to be a lie due to the fact he was not large enough also no one else corroburated his story and he would not take a lie detector test.bob gimlin took one and passed it
mullinaxbridgett43 1 month ago
@mullinaxbridgett43 Reinke claimed that Roger Patterson was on the company's payroll as a "wildlife photographer." According to Reinke, Patterson and ANE "cooked up" the scheme to fake the Bigfoot film. ANE's alleged plan was to use the film as a "loss leader" that would attract huge audiences into theaters to see the footage (sandwiched in between their other movies).
danthman114 1 month ago