JOHN BOEHNER SLAPS DOWN WAXMAN - PART 2

"In the year 2018, 20% of energy must come from renewable sources. Do we know if that is even possible?" lol, that was great.

doesn't matter whats in teh bill- no republican will vote for it anywyay. its all a dog & pony show.

VOTE OUT HENRY WAXMAN, HE WANTS TO KILL THE USA. HE IS ANTI-AMERICAN.
I havent been an active voter, but come
2010, I will vote Republican all the way.
They all suck, but the republicans suck much less. The lesser of two evils.
The DEMOCRAPS, want people in despot situation, so we rely on the government for even necessities let alone
anything else. The more you rely on government for even the simplest requirements, they will have you by your balls, and dicate everything.

I couldn't help but think... in your face Waxman... I CAN NOT BELIEVE that they still voted on this bill with over 300 pages added at 3am THE DAY OF THE VOTE... and 38% of them actually read the 300+ pages before voting. Where else in this country can you do your job the same way and not be fired!!! If any of my employee signed a 2 page contract without reading it... they would probably be fired, not to mention 300+ pages OF LAW!!! Are these people freaking serious!?!?!?!?

waxman is a lil whiney wimp, he doesnt want Boehner to talk truth! I hope he is voted out in 2010!

What is sad is only 658 people have viewed this exchange while millions are watching Mike the freak show Jackson get buried. Our country is being dumbed down by this hollywood style media. WHO CARES WHO IS F ING WHO IN HOLLYWOOD.

re: pcpiman
"Submit yourselves to every ordinance of man for the Lord's sake: whether it be to the king, as supreme"

Well does this sound familiar?

I dont know if this applies in you case, but isnt it interesting that many there are, who upon encountering a passage of scripture appearing to contradict a point they are trying to make, dismiss the it as being mistranslated, or incomplete, or just plain wrong. While on the other hand, a scripture supporting their position is usually presented, without qualification, as supporting evidence. You cant have it both ways.

Peter 2:13 if you're asking for a citation.