Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Judge Martha Anderson disqualification in Rick P Brode vs Beverly Hires Part 3 of 3

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,027
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 25, 2009

Part 3 of 3, Judge Martha Anderson Disqualifies herself in a dramatic way. Attorney Bill Garratt argued that Susan Paletz, attorney for Rick P Brode and Judge Anderson failed to disclose professional, personal and financial relationships making the case for the disqualification of presiding Judge. Judicial disqualification of Judge Martha D Anderson Family Law Court, Michigan 6th Circuit Court on 01/28/09. Judge is disqualified. Part 3 of 3.

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (14)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • wow that was crazyyyyyyyy. Why did she disqualify herself???? well whatever. All i gotta say is "BYE BYE MARTHA, YA LOUD MOUTHED BITCH" LOL

  • Bye bye bias

  • @gj804 I agree. I can understand why she is upset - it would always be hard to disqualify oneself. At least in the end she did the right thing. I also agree that there should be some kind of judicial rule against hearing arguments from an attorney that you have employed (even in a voluntary capacity).

  • I can see where the judge would be offended that would be showing bias. However, if I were a judge, I would never want there to be an APPEARANCE of bias. There should be a law if not an explicit policy to avoid this type of situation. I find disconcerting that courts of Michigan (or any jurisdiction anywhere) would allow a judge to hear a case where one of the lawyers that helped get him/her reelected is litigating the case.

  • She is frightening. I think in order to neuter her you would have to begin by taking away her diet of raw meat for breakfast. Once they get the sense of blood - yikes!

    We have an expectation about courts and judges (to be a place where justice results). However, judges are administrative in concerns with policy. They are addressing a fiction and not directly the live man or woman who is the authorized representative to that fiction. It's all about trust and they swop roles with the players.

  • The judge might need to be disbarred or should not have been re-elected to the bench. Why didn't someone run against her. .When good people do nothing, evil grows. Her attitude to me seems awful.

  • You are a Judicial whore. You belong to a society of despots whom usurp Law and create color. Your furthering the fraud, only willing to see a corporate fictitious TRUST, not a natural man should require death by hanging for treason.

    .

    Unconstitutional, the sovereign State and the sovereign have been defrauded and you remain willing to further the fraud, your life's work has no value. You are an enemy of the Constitution, the sovereign People and your ego is the color of your law.

  • Remrett: Are you kidding? Bias rules the day in most courtrooms. Citizens demand that judges not even appear to be bias. "My campaign manager tries cases before me, but there isn't anything wrong with that?" That statment alone should disqualify her from sitting as a judge, as it goes to her ability to make reasoned decisions.

  • See this American system of electing judge. Its appalling. Judges should be put on the bench for life and not be political. Just like this instance there always going to be allegations of bias.

  • that's the first lawyer I've every seen work for the client!..........great job!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more