WTC No Plane Truth (Part 20)

This is an evaluation of the impact damage to the South Tower vs. the wingspan of Flight 175

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 911
• 9/11
• wtc
• nyc
• no
• plane
• theory
• flight
• 175
• fakery
• footage
• conspiracy
• south
• crash
• wingspan
• impact

[JSillynutz]

Great videos all of them! Have not watched them in awhile. Still makes me wonder how people think that this was a terrorist attack. So many tv zombies out there. Thanks for your work.

[muzicmaker2001]

@86Blessed86

In all of the plane vs buildings/hard surfaces I've seen, aluminum planes don't enter buildings. Yes, they are pulverized at impact but they rain down below without entering. I agree about the cartoon shaped hole. Check out the North Tower impact hole. Apparently, Wile E Coyote was flying that plane??

watch?v=tRLBvPMyDSQ

[muzicmaker2001]

@86Blessed86

So, the only people that come onto these videos are one's that support it? Uhh, what? Here's the obvious question. What about you? And aluminum planes do not enter a building and any hard surface with no damage..never have , never will. Welcome to real physics..

[mphasis1983]

@86Blessed86 ok its a 767,but it still cant go at that speed that low.

"the hole in the side of the North tower was the size of a 767."

but planes do not slice through steel so it couldnt have been made by a plane.

[86Blessed86]

@86Blessed86 Also the video's are so blurred out by converting them over on your computer that it looks more fake then it actually is, why are the video's so blurred out?

[86Blessed86]

@muzicmaker2001 Really, the only people that come on to these video's come on here because they support your theory, so obviously you will have thumbs up, it is physics, a plane that size and at that speed will not hit the building, crumple up and fall to the ground, you totally ignored my example of the Empire State Building plane crash which went right into and partly through the building.

[muzicmaker2001]

@86Blessed86

I think people are giving this a thumbs up because they disagree with you. They actually think what you're saying is BS. And that makes sense if they have any shred of intelligence. None of the footage shows any damaging occuring to the plane and building at impact. The entire plane, wings tail and all, just melt right into the Towers as if it were a CGI image. But, you bring up physics? Brilliant!!!

[mphasis1983]

@86Blessed86 "by the time the plane hit the building, it would have started to disintegrate from impact"

please show me the video of 175 disintegrating upon impact because in all the footage ive seen it doesnt seem to do that.

"Look video's when the fires are burning in the towers, opposite where the planes went into the buildings"

no opposite where the missiles went in.

[mphasis1983]

@86Blessed86 do you realise how many people never saw a plane?and you say the LIVE news feed,which added the planes lol.ok,some simple logic.757's cant go that speed at sea level.so you think the tower would offer no resistance to the plane?i wonder why the plane didnt explode upon impact but decided to when inside the building?it didnt need to did it it just survived the steel columns but i suppose it thought fuck it might aswell put on a show instead of flying out the other side intact lol.

[86Blessed86]

@mphasis1983 "we see a whole plane cut through steel unscaved." this is your statement? by the time the plane hit the building, it would have started to disintegrate from impact and by the time it reached the other side of the building it would have been pretty much nothing. Look video's when the fires are burning in the towers, opposite where the planes went into the buildings, you can see massive fires, this is because the planes pushed debris from inside, into one area.