A Question Of The Origins (Creation/Evolution) (Part 1 of 3)

RANDOM MUTATIONS, THE BIG BANG THEORY, AND LAWS OF ENTROPY

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• evolution
• creation
• Darwin
• God
• Bible
• intelligent
• design
• transitional
• form
• Big
• Bang
• theory
• natural
• selection
• atheist
• chimp

[evidenceonly]

RELIGION  = PERMANENT PURVEYORS OF PIFFLE

[MrSandykramer]

@Punkinthepark1

Everything which has a beginning has a cause. At least try to get it right.

[acyberguy]

I am going to church right now...then teach Sunday school.

[Waustvanput]

quit using abiogenesis and cosmology when you talk about evolution!!!!!

[oxymoron616]

Declaring the universe a closed system without knowing anything about it is folly. Science doesn't even have a theory of gravity they want to share with the common people, because all the basics are false. What they call science is a bunch of bald-faced propaganda. As Hitler said, don't tell small lies, they aren't believed; go with the big lies, the people are suckers for these. Scientists evolved into priests and unproven theories into dogmas.

[MrMantastic9]

Are you telling me these people have legitimate scientific careers? well, I guess that means I have a Job when I get older, cause these people are fucking stupid.

[gregrutz]

Creation ''Scientists' don't believe in natural selection, that is evolution.

Evolution has been seen happening in nature and in the lab.

No debate is  ''raging on''

The Big Bang is not evolution, it was not an explosion.

Typical Creationists crap video.

[thunder12327]

@lednerg The point was that the only mutations that have arisen in this generation are birth defects and diseases. There is only one mutation that has occurred which resulted in one good outcome (and a host of other bad problems) which is sickle cell anemia because of immunity to malaria. The idea that space and time are expanding is not fact. Priests also molest children... I could stick to the literal interpretation or I could experience the revelation of God

[puncheex]

But, you could be right - God could have made this all the way it appears 6000 years ago, or 30 minutes ago; there is no way to prove he didn't. Because of that possibility, science looks only for natural effects, and bars the supernatural. I must say that if you do believe that though, your god certainly has this penchant for deceiving; we'd call that lying if one of us were doing it.  Would you call that omni-prevarication?

[puncheex]

@aka4god: Naw, you're just being obtuse. There is genetic evidence in the comparison of the genomes of all the species we have so far done genomes for; there is morphological evidence in the bodies of both extinct and current hominids; there's chronological evidence in the results from the various dating methods used to date fossils. Science doesn't teach some theory because it is the only one (even if that were true) unless there is positive evidence for it.