UNdisputable evidence that Jesus is GOD - prove me wrong. (Part 4)
Loading...
241
views
Loading...
Uploader Comments (doctorh2005)
see all
All Comments (28)
-
/// Col 1;15,16.. Jesus was created and the image of the Almighty God. If jesus is god, why didn't he just pray himself? Oh, God,, can't die;) Jesus did and was resurrected by God ///
Good question - this is where the Biblical teaching of the "Trinity" comes in - Jesus (who is God the Son) wasnt praying to Himself - He was praying to God the Father.... thats why He prayed "Our Father"
-
For Jehovah is a jealous God, exacting exclusive devotion. Col 1;15,16.. Jesus was created and the image of the Almighty God. If jesus is god, why didn't he just pray himself? Oh, God,, can't die;) Jesus did and was resurrected by God.
Loading...
DID HE DIE OR NOT?
If he DIED then he is NOT Eternal, and therefore Eternal is a lie.
If he did NOT DIE, then only his flesh died, therefore only his flesh was resurrected, and therefore only flesh is justified and heir to the kingdom.
But we know that flesh cannot inherit the kingdom. The Son cannot be the Father; if the Son is in fact also the Father, then mankind cannot be saved because the Father *cannot* die.
EliYahweh 2 months ago
@EliYahweh
/// DID HE DIE OR NOT? If he DIED then he is NOT Eternal ///
Scripture says Christ, who is both God AND man, was "put to death IN THE FLESH" (see 1 PETER 3:18) - meaning, Christ, in His HUMAN nature, died - but not His divine nature - which is eternal.
/// The Son cannot be the Father ///
Christians do not teach that He is the Father.
Jesus Christ is "God THE SON", and is distinct from God the FATHER and God the HOLY SPIRIT.
doctorh2005 2 months ago
@doctorh2005
If ONLY his flesh died, then ONLY his flesh was resurrected and therefore ONLY FLESH is heir to the kingdom and the promise.
EliYahweh 2 months ago
The Father and the Son are separate personalities, who are AKHAD.
Another problem you have is the term G-d itself. If you are going to "PROVE" things, then define via ACTUAL TERMS and their ACTUAL MEANINGS, in CONTEXT.
"G-d" is of pagan origin, and does NOT apply to the identity or person of Yahweh, nor Yahshua his son. The correct terms are Eloahi, Elohim and Elah.
"G-d" is an inaccurate SUBSTITUTE. You cannot *prove* truth by starting off with failed terminology.
EliYahweh 2 months ago
@EliYahweh
/// The Father and the Son are separate personalities ///
It would be more accurate to say, along with the that the Father and Son are NOT "separate" personalities.... but rather "distinct" Persons - for if the Father, Son and Holy Spirit were "separate".... we would be worshipping "3 GODS" - but we worship ONE God, in three distinct Persons.
doctorh2005 2 months ago
@EliYahweh
/// "G-d" is of pagan origin ///
Nah.... God is "eternal" and has no origin at all. He simply "is".
/// The correct terms are Eloahi, Elohim and Elah. ///
He is also "Kurios" (Lord) and "Theos" (God) - terms which God the Holy Spirit inspired the New Testament writers to write.
We interpret the Old Testment (the Tanakh/Torah) in light of the New Testament.
The New Testament is a brighter light than the Old.
doctorh2005 2 months ago
@EliYahweh
/// If ONLY his flesh died, then ONLY his flesh was resurrected and therefore ONLY FLESH is heir to the kingdom and the promise. ///
You misunderstood what I said - Jesus has TWO natures - fully God... and fully MAN.
In his "humanity", Christ had a real human body, and also had a REAL human "soul".
It was His human body and soul that died - His "human" nature, not His "divine" nature.
doctorh2005 2 months ago