Water has Memory

http://oasishd.ca - Water -- just a liquid or much more? Many researchers are convinced that water is capable of "memory" by storing information and retrieving it. The possible applications are innumerable: limitless retention and storage capacity and the key to discovering the origins of life on our planet. Research into water is just beginning.

Join Oasis HD Facebook page for more exclusive videos
http://facebook.com/oasishdchannel

Follow Oasis HD on Twitter
http://twitter.com/oasishd

• Category

  Science & Technology

[TweenieDevil]

if water has memory and is as old as time and makes up 75% of our bodies than we must have the knowledge of the entire universe within us!

[nopacnone]

So I guess none out of the millions of scientists who have put water under a microscope for the past 200 years had any interest in noticing the greatest discovery in the history of mankind.

I have an idea, let me make tons of crazy science discovery videos that entirely disregard science, and I'll make mad money! Wait, someone is doing that already.

[Kepler780]

Pretty awesome :D

[Animuldok]

When the water has left... we will be dead. Or did you miss that day in science class?

[Animuldok]

It appears to be the residue left when the drop evaporates. Like a waterspot on a glass. I would agree, I have never seen an actual drop of water look anything like his images when viewed under a microscope.

[SonikkuFuru]

I can't wait to see blind people to use water to see things in a different way. This is just a thing of creativity in my mind

[Emmanuel Badawi]

So would soil have memory as well?

[BackToConstitution]

Do bears pee in the water, before the Dutch drink it?

Heb draagt ​​plassen in het water, voordat de Nederlanders drinken?

[SanderWolbers]

The dutch living on the mountain? The Netherlands is completely flat

[dragonknight31]

I just put my ipad in a bowl of water to obtain all the knowledge of the internet.

[LKA84]

As long as the existence of a phenomenon cannot be proven, it does not require explaining. Your argument "can scientists explain god" uses the existence of god as a given fact, which it is not. This makes your reasoning flawed. You may as well have said "can scientists explain ghosts?".

I think you owe Nopacnone an apology for running your mouth like that.

[Teppei9asone]

except that, scientists don't burn you on a stake if you don't believe in them.