Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Manuel DeLanda. Deleuze and the History of Philosophy 2006 1/8

http://www.egs.edu/ Manuel DeLanda lecturing about the philosophy of Gilles Deleuze, Henri Poincare, Albert Einstein, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, computer,science, logic, semantics, meaning, god, sp...  
 
Customize

More From: egsvideo

Loading...

Playlist(8)

9:35
9:50
9:59
9:42
10:00
9:30
9:39
7:09

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

43 ratings
Sign in to rate
16,321 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (25)   Options

Loading...
ogfunk187 (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
thanks so much for posting these (including greg lynns stuff). its a great source of info, please leave it up!!
dhyanabum (5 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
EGS is it some kind of cult?
egsvideo (4 months ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
yes. the european graduate school is "some kind of cult" - and its by invitation only. you are welcome.
pilkingtonphil (7 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
.....scientists, like one's that read fiction, fall in love or reflect on the meaning of existence beyond the closed language of formalism, would probably disagree with your blatent dogmatism.

But then dogmatic scientists tend - if you'll allow me to employ some psychological terms (be careful, these might imply intersubjectivity and hence be "unscientific") - to be narcissistic, overly sure of themselves, authoritarian, reductionist and, to be frank, closed off from 90% of human experience!
paintacanvass (7 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Maybe you could involve them in that 90% of human experience then, or was that an attempt to dehumanise them?
pilkingtonphil (7 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Pretty simple discrepancy here, I think I can clear up the misunderstanding.

Science = philosophical vulgarisation + non-philosophic interpretations.

It comes down to the question: is scientific discourse all there is? Is mathematics and it's derivatives capable of completely explaining human experience. Can it accomadate aesthetics, ethics and legality?

If not, and if philosophy is "not interesting" for scientists then scientists are reductionist and violent. Of course most non-dogmatic.....
fraserdaly (8 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Ha, ha, ha. Remarks like that, on a video like this, were sure to elicit hostile responses.
Your remarks do an injustice to what is going on in much of mainstream contemporary philosophy, which I have a feeling you haven't really looked into.
B3LLEND (8 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Surely its more than coincidence then that some of the greatest Mathemeticians in history were also Philosophers:
Rene Descartes
Aristotle
Bertrand Russell
Kurt Godel
Pythagoras
To name only a few. Modern Science and Maths stems from philosophical ideas
Philosophaie Naturalis Principia Mathematica (Mathematical Principals of Natural Philosophie) arguably the geatest scientific work ever written, by Isaac Newton, Physicist and Mathematician.
Everything involves Philosophy, naive twat
avebarra (9 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
I like Deleuze but I'm worried that this guy might pace himself to death.
paintacanvass (9 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Yes, it's a shame that the original Christian hymn that inspired your comment is based on the worship of a religious martyr, who was SACRIFICED for humanity, isn't it?

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.