http://www.egs.edu/ Manuel DeLanda lecturing about the philosophy of Gilles Deleuze, Henri Poincare, Albert Einstein, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, computer,science, logic, semantics, meaning, god, sp...
http://www.egs.edu/ Manuel DeLanda lecturing about the philosophy of Gilles Deleuze, Henri Poincare, Albert Einstein, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, computer,science, logic, semantics, meaning, god, space, 3d, and the understanding of geometry and mathematics in an open lecture at European Graduate School EGS, Media and Communication Studies department program. Saas-Fee, Switzerland 2006. Manuel de Landa.
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
.....scientists, like one's that read fiction, fall in love or reflect on the meaning of existence beyond the closed language of formalism, would probably disagree with your blatent dogmatism.
But then dogmatic scientists tend - if you'll allow me to employ some psychological terms (be careful, these might imply intersubjectivity and hence be "unscientific") - to be narcissistic, overly sure of themselves, authoritarian, reductionist and, to be frank, closed off from 90% of human experience!
It comes down to the question: is scientific discourse all there is? Is mathematics and it's derivatives capable of completely explaining human experience. Can it accomadate aesthetics, ethics and legality?
If not, and if philosophy is "not interesting" for scientists then scientists are reductionist and violent. Of course most non-dogmatic.....
Ha, ha, ha. Remarks like that, on a video like this, were sure to elicit hostile responses. Your remarks do an injustice to what is going on in much of mainstream contemporary philosophy, which I have a feeling you haven't really looked into.
Surely its more than coincidence then that some of the greatest Mathemeticians in history were also Philosophers: Rene Descartes Aristotle Bertrand Russell Kurt Godel Pythagoras To name only a few. Modern Science and Maths stems from philosophical ideas Philosophaie Naturalis Principia Mathematica (Mathematical Principals of Natural Philosophie) arguably the geatest scientific work ever written, by Isaac Newton, Physicist and Mathematician. Everything involves Philosophy, naive twat
Yes, it's a shame that the original Christian hymn that inspired your comment is based on the worship of a religious martyr, who was SACRIFICED for humanity, isn't it?
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
But then dogmatic scientists tend - if you'll allow me to employ some psychological terms (be careful, these might imply intersubjectivity and hence be "unscientific") - to be narcissistic, overly sure of themselves, authoritarian, reductionist and, to be frank, closed off from 90% of human experience!
Science = philosophical vulgarisation + non-philosophic interpretations.
It comes down to the question: is scientific discourse all there is? Is mathematics and it's derivatives capable of completely explaining human experience. Can it accomadate aesthetics, ethics and legality?
If not, and if philosophy is "not interesting" for scientists then scientists are reductionist and violent. Of course most non-dogmatic.....
Your remarks do an injustice to what is going on in much of mainstream contemporary philosophy, which I have a feeling you haven't really looked into.
Rene Descartes
Aristotle
Bertrand Russell
Kurt Godel
Pythagoras
To name only a few. Modern Science and Maths stems from philosophical ideas
Philosophaie Naturalis Principia Mathematica (Mathematical Principals of Natural Philosophie) arguably the geatest scientific work ever written, by Isaac Newton, Physicist and Mathematician.
Everything involves Philosophy, naive twat