34 - God? Or The Multiverse?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
6,277
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 20, 2009

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (10thdim)

  • its not an either or...god isnt even a theory and the mutiverse theory is a weak one.

  • What gives you the idea that the multiverse theory is weak? Here's what physicist Raphael Bousso says about it:

    "This may seem laughable, but without the multiverse our finest theories predict that empty space should contain about 10^123 times more energy than it actually does. This is known as the cosmological constant or dark energy problem. It has been called the worst prediction in the history of science and the mother of all physics problems.

    Rob

  • It always amazes me how people assume 'God' came first when it really is more Goddess. Whereas the former patriarchal concept has him as distinct from his creation, the latter IS creation itself, her BODY, so it fits better to me than either monotheism or deism

  • Does that mean if the question were re-phrased to "Do you believe in Goddess? Or the multiverse?' your answer would be "both"? Makes sense to me.

    Rob

see all

All Comments (139)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @10thdim Because it can not be proven yet.

  • What we are forgetting here is that "Someone" already claimed that He (no gender implied) designed this universe, not just by one or two, but by hundreds or even thousands of messengers. Call Him God, Elohim, Jehovah, the Father, Allah or any other name, still the claim is very serious and worth serious investigation by all of us.

  • "both" would be best as a multiverse wouldn't be much fun without someone to observe it.

    I also suspect a creator/observer that transcends the multiverse wouldn't appreciate the limitations of anthropomorphic adjectives - or to paraphrase Mr. Spock, "what would God want with a beard?" Would the creator/observer also accept the limitations of 10 dimensions? Wouldn't it be fun to be the observer AND the observed?

    PS: in case God is watching... thanks for pizza and beer! :)

  • mm, an infinite amount of gods(max.info). lol, for we are many.

  • modus tollens

    If multiverse theory is false (P), then Christ's Kingdom exists finitely in this kosmos. (Q)

    "My kingdom is not of this (Gr.) kosmos" Joh 18:36 (Not Q)

    Therefore, mulitverse theory is not false. (Not P)

  • I tend to worship god AS the multiverse. So both.

  • And think of it this way, if the multi-verse theory was true then there would be other worlds, but different. Maybe in another world Adam and Eve wouldn't have sinned, or it would've been Jesus Christ who rebelled, but that seems highly illogical. Another thing that proves this wrong is that Jehovah would have to follow the rules of multi-verse, which would make his divinity seem to exist. As a result he would be a normal being, like us.

  • This is easy.... Jehovah God!!! Oh, and God is a spirit , so he doesn't have a gender. Although, he possesses characteristics of both a mother and father. For example, Psalms 89:26 says, " He himself calls out to me, 'You are my Father, My God and the Rock of my salvation.' While Proverbs 8:23-25, it says that he created everything "as with labor pains". Obviously, only mothers expreience labor pains.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more