YouTube home Comedy Week on YouTube
Upload

Why Is Making A Reusable Rocket So Difficult? Elon Musk

spacexchannel spacexchannel·101 videos
38,340
24,786
Like     Dislike 3

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like spacexchannel's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike spacexchannel's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add spacexchannel's video to your playlist.

Uploaded on Dec 20, 2011

Visit: http://www.spacex.com/ for more information on SpaceX, Dragon, Falcon 9, Falcon Heavy, reusable rockets, grasshopper, Mars, upcoming rocket launch, or Elon Musk.

SpaceX CEO & Chief Designer Elon Musk discusses the difficulty of making a reusable rocket. Filmed at The National Press Club.

For more information on SpaceX:
http://www.spacex.com/
http://twitter.com/spacex
http://www.facebook.com/SpaceX

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Top Comments

  • Clint Johnson

    To those confused about the context, this isn't about "the space program", it is about Elon Musk's company working hard on a difficult engineering problem. You may feel that people should "scrap" a project because it is difficult. Well, I am filled with joy and relief there are people like Elon who are ready, willing and able to put their time and money on the line to open space; not because it is easy OR because it is hard... but because it is the most important thing that it is possible to do.

    · 134

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Clint Johnson's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Clint Johnson's comment.
  • Ian Kennedy

    Space-X is the future of space access. It's great to see someone finally doing this right.

    Make no mistake, I love NASA. I love their heritage and what they want to do. But since they are seen by elected officials as, essentially, and "jobs program" you do not see the kind of efficiency from them that SpaceX has demonstrated.

    I'm glad to see the private sector pick up the orbital trucking task. NASA should be about bold, bleeding edge technology right on the edge of feasibility.

    · 79

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Ian Kennedy's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Ian Kennedy's comment.

All Comments (88)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • Clint Johnson

    The first stage is only traveling about 4100 mph when it separates, not the 17,000 mph that their Dragon spaceship successfully reenters at. They know the structural capabilities and what it should be able to handle so they know how much they have to slow it from that. Some of the best aerospace engineers on the planet have looked at all of your concerns and they believe they can work them out. They will have failures on the way, but it is reasonable to expect a reusable first stage before 2020.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Clint Johnson's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Clint Johnson's comment.
    in reply to drumchakra (Show the comment)
  • drumchakra

    The heat of the rentry and braking will deteriorate  the structured frame of the chassis. Fail prediction right now.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate drumchakra's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate drumchakra's comment.
    in reply to Clint Johnson (Show the comment)
  • Clint Johnson

    You seem confused about what Spacex is developing. Currently, the first stage doesn't go to space, but separates on the edge of space then falls to its destruction. A wide safety margin for fuel means there is generally a lot of fuel left in the tanks. Elon plans to use that fuel, and a bit more if needed, for an apogee burn to slow and orient the stage, then a near ground re-ignition to slow the stage for a survivable water landing or gentle strut landing. Saving tens of millions each launch.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Clint Johnson's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Clint Johnson's comment.
    in reply to drumchakra (Show the comment)
  • drumchakra

    Has this rocket ever left Earth's gravity and returned?

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate drumchakra's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate drumchakra's comment.
    in reply to Clint Johnson (Show the comment)
  • Clint Johnson

    You use the word "impossibility's" (sic), but since you are emphatically incorrect in its usage, it appears you have no idea what it actually means. Feeling sad at your embarrassment, I've include the actual definition for your edification so you do not make such a fool of yourself in the future. You're welcome.

    impossibility

    /imˌpäsəˈbilitē/

    Noun

    The state or fact of being impossible.

    An impossible thing or situation.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Clint Johnson's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Clint Johnson's comment.
    in reply to drumchakra (Show the comment)
  • Joseph Stern

    You are correct about the speed requirements for stable orbits, but nuclear-powered rocketry would not be used to inject spacecraft into planetary orbits, or maintain them in such orbits; it would be used to traverse interplanetary space (as, for instance, on a Mars mission). Such traversals can be made along ballistic trajectories, where a single initial velocity vector is obtained by firing the main thruster, and the trajectory is only corrected with smaller thrusters from then on.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Joseph Stern's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Joseph Stern's comment.
    in reply to Justin Liu (Show the comment)
  • Joseph Stern

    Again, I don't follow. You replied to a post in which I was conversing with someone else about the possibilities for Orion-type rockets, which work by exploding nuclear bombs behind a shock-absorbing pusher plate. I chimed in that expecting Orion-type rockets to be approved anytime in the foreseeable future is probably foolish, but that perhaps an NTR might eventually become politically feasible. The conversation was originally about specific impulse and mass-to-orbit, NOT about speed.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Joseph Stern's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Joseph Stern's comment.
    in reply to Justin Liu (Show the comment)
  • Joseph Stern

    I'm afraid I don't follow. What's "my rocket"? Do you mean NTR's (nuclear thermal rockets)? If so, you may want to look up NERVA, a lab-tested nuclear rocket engine designed by NASA in the late 1960s and early 1970s. The technology for this has been well-understood for decades, but with the Cold War over and the space race defused, and with all things nuclear being made into political poison by the radical Green movement, there just isn't the will to see it through. One can hope, though.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Joseph Stern's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Joseph Stern's comment.
    in reply to Justin Liu (Show the comment)
  • drumchakra

    The dude is wasting his money so guys like you and him can jerk off over impossibility's

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate drumchakra's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate drumchakra's comment.
    in reply to Clint Johnson (Show the comment)
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later