Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Mark on Jupiter May Indicate Large Suspot

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
1,324
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (astrotometry)

  • I thought NASA determined this was the result of a meteorite. Just like the Shumaker-Levy (sp) a few years back.

  • Considering that the mark grew to the size of Earth in the WEEK following the supposed collision, it's a stretch to believe that this was caused by a small object. The SL impact effect was not a total drop-out in the visible spectrum. This has the characteristics of out-of-phase energy translation through hypertime.

    /watch?v=oTyf1LXWjHI&

  • FYI:  As of today the mark is still growing and is starting to separate into "two lobes".

  • apparently the object is the size of the pacific ocean... could be very interesting to co-relate any hypertime shadows and weather systems which occur, it might give some profound clues as to how the solar system works under your model. with data like this coming along, a testable hypothesis should be on the horizon (figuratively speaking)

  • Yep. If we locate a big incoming comet then that would definitely reinforce the theory. And the payola from my perspective on this would be to have a third data point from which to sort out the plane in which hyper-time operates.

see all

All Comments (23)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • John did you do a follow up vid on Venus' white spot right after Jupiter's Dark Spot?

  • This is Hubble's first science observation following its repair and upgrade in May, FYI.

  • The black spot is most likely an impact on the surface of jupiter. It's very similar to other impact marks left by large objects.

    The infrared mark is due to the heat energy of the clouds. (warm things put off infrared heat, which is how heat-cameras work.)

    It's actually fun, at the observatory where i work, we take data from nebulae in several bands. Infrared always produces the best results because it can see non-bright material which just happens to be warm.

  • Comment on this one if you'd like to continue learning about what I'm proposing. -John

    /watch?v=oTyf1LXWjHI

  • and?

  • multiple axes of time that are interfered with when an object's orbit is inconsistent- the sun's are those axes

  • so what are you saying, two suns?

  • Ironically, it would have been a thousand years if it was not for Tesla. This was only made possible by the information systems that rode in on his creations.

  • Your diagrams/illustrations immediately struck a chord and Walter Russell immediately came to mind...then to see his quote on your site was a pleasant surprise as is rare to come across his name ...he supposedly took his work to Tesla, who told him to put it away for a thousand years as the sheople of the day would not comprehend...The Secret of Light is a good place to start....some of his diagrams and articles are on the web...if you have "time" please share your thoughts.....

  • I don't know that much about Russell, except what he means by that quote. If you have a particular work of his you'd recommend, I bet it's good stuff.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more