Chopin 12 Etudes Op. 10 (nos. 1-4) Sandro Russo Pianist
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (21)
-
and chopinesque77, The point is his interpretation is good(really i think), but there can be individual differences.
-
Sorry, I am not live in English-speaking countries and not good at writing or speaking. So I have to say no bluntly.
Whatever, I usally using google translate program.
and, If you're angry, I'm sorry that I said.
-
@FolderFILEneT All the great artists made some mistakes in live performances, yet the real value of a performance depends on much deeper things than what you pointed out. The world is full of machines who play all the notes perfectly but they arent able to make any music out of that. So go refine your ears!
-
number 4 was amazing!
-
i think it changes around
-
J'admire la clarté de ce jeu. Quelle maîtrise !
-
too mechanic. etude 2 is, beside technically lack, is lack in spirit. no ghost i can here there
-
Behold a great master of the keyboard -- one of many in the world today -- but he plays with a unusual style and verve.
Opus 10 #2, was especially good. I loved the way he brought ought out some unusual details in the tenor voice. Only Cortot has ever done that to my knowledge, and HE emphasizes different aspects than those of Mr. Russo.
I don't think Chopin asked for Presto Possible in #4. I'd like to hear more space between phrases, and less constant forte.
Even so it's just great.
Oh now No. 3 was just too gorgeous! This guy knows Chopin. Bravo!
Grigor99 2 years ago 5
Yes, very strong and nuanced. Until now, I heard only Richter's, but Russo is definitely right up there at the lonely summit
sagalat 3 years ago 5