yahya khan president of Pakistan 1971

No description available.

Category:

Travel & Events

Tags:

• yahya
• khan
• president
• of
• Pakistan
• 1971

[dan90sh]

@zakuza92 Political aspects of Islam has nothing to do with the political or army elite rulings.If it would be Islamic politics there would have never been wars between India and Pakistan.

[goodearthful]

General Yahaya Khan was a devilish person. He caused a heavy shame to the Pakistanis. He was a habitual womaniser and drinker. He did not quit womanising and drinking even during the time of war.

[uindeu]

On 16 December 1971, General Jagjit Singh Arora General-Officer-Commanding In-Chief of the Indian Army accepted surrender by Pakistani General Amir Abdullah Khan Niazi and 93,000 Pakistani forces. This was the largest number of POWs since World War II. Pakistan lost 140,000sq.km of area.

[zakuza92]

@manhornz

Lolz, you are funny. See, the nasals are only 6000-7000 people and that also between trees and bushes and in the isolated jungles of Jharkhand or Orissa. Although, they are scattered in bits and pieces, they don't have ultimate authority over anyone. They act independently on their own and are bound to collapse. Regarding Kashmir, many Kashmiris now don't want to go with Pak either. They don't want 2 join Pak. And pro-Khalistan rally is done by a selected grp of ppl in Punjab.

[zakuza92]

@manhornz

Well, I don't hate Pakistan. I am not against it. I am simply against the ruling elite of Pakistan. I hate the president and PM both. I also hate the Army. Whoever is in charge. But, there are also some sensible Pakistanis that I've spoken to. Well, since you are brainwashed, it's not your fault for being ill-informed about the war.I don't hate muslims. I just hate the political aspect of Islam.

[manhornz]

@zakuza92

Tbh we're quite successful if you think about the fact that during independence we only had 5% of industry b/w us but have come to match (and even exceeded at times) the GDP per capita of Bharat

Most importantly, the fact that 30% of India is controlled by the Naxalite insurgency, Muslims in Kashmir (and even the rest of the nation) hate you Hindu's and seek independence as do the Sikhs that seek a separate Khalistan state it's more appropriate to label yours the failed state

[manhornz]

@zakuza92

We'll never be a part of Bharat nor were we ever because we're the offspring of warriors/kings not a people whose ancestry comes from jungle people of Bharat - the manpower odds you used to have aren't that much in your favor anymore why during the Kargil conflict you never made it across the border (the lie you never tried is bullshit - your forces did come across but were beaten back) and why you didn't do jack shit even later on after other heightened moments of tension.

[manhornz]

@zakuza92

"Ha ha ha nice bunch of crap" Bharati boy.

Just before the '71 conflict during the 1965 war outnumbered 9 to 1 we inflicted as much casualty on you as you did on us - you gained a little more land thanks to the fact that overall your population is around 7 to 1 larger than us (I subtracted the Muslim population and was overly generous) so your army in general will have far more resources/manpower to work with.

You seriously think you won - that's utterly humiliating

[zakuza92]

@manhornz

Ha ha ha Nice bunch of crap Paki Boy. Pakis lost all the three wars. Listen to Asghar Khan. He'll tell you the truth. Pakistan is a F-A-I-L-E-D state. Failed state and will soon acquire the first position as being the topmost failed state. Pak is a laughing stock and nothing else. Read the poem called Pity The Nation by Khalil Gibran of Lebanon. If you want, I can translate it for you. I don't see too much hope for Pakistan. I feel it'll be later on reincorporated back into India.

[roxor1080]

@Re4perZer0 Bengali and Pashtun ? ! Whatever, he is NOT a Pashtun! He is a Qizilbash, who are Shia fighters of Azeri (Turk) and Persian descent and, in his case, his ancestors were PERSIANS (what we now call Tajiks - Persians from Afghanistan.)