Engine Running on Hydrogen / Oxygen HOH HHO
Uploader Comments (hohcells)
Top Comments
-
130 volts * 10 amps = 1300watt or 1.3KW
now that is alot of input power,
omg we are supposed to make it more efficient and not the other way around!
stanley meyers claimed to have done it using under one watt and also having massive oxygen-hydrogen gas mixture output!!! now that is an accomplishment!
efficiency people!!!! increase efficiency!!! together we can achieve it!
-
You must be the most stupid person on the Web
Video Responses
All Comments (137)
-
nice job and well done brother....peace
-
To all the people doubting this you need to visit tezpower.com. It has a an honest, no bull explanation with realistic expectations. I met the guy in Iceland when I was on holiday with a mutual friend. Ive seen first hand the cleanliness of the engines, he is testing on dirtbikes, quads, cars, road bikes - everything. Ive got a clip of my mate riding the blue harley in the articles, it sounds amazing and the throttle response is so quick he bypassed the pump.
-
you should feed the electricity generated by the generator back into the HHO cell ...
-
@hohcells 1300 watts consumption at 80 percent efficiency only produced 6.6 liters per minute of HHO an energy output equal to approximately 1.36Hp. Your 2.4HP petrol engine (generator) was not under any electrical load at the time of testing. The question is how many liters per minute of HHO is required to run this engine at 2200 RPM under a full load?
-
Relying grossly on basic equations which -can't- properly tell the story... and THEIR given numbers (if honest) - the reactor (he says) is 130v x 10a = 1300 watts. The genny, at 2.4hp = 1790 watts. So if it is self running, it is because it should be able to produce it's own fuel, mathematically. And that's just using what is told. Of course it can idle. Try that with a skill saw plugged in? I'll bet 6 minutes worth of gasoline took less energy to produce.
-
the thing is, how many litters of hho do we need to be efficient?
1L per minute of hho, I thnk it is not enough to improve the combustion.
4-5L per minute, it may be the correct quantity of hho ?
cool, i never figured this would be practical due to the electrical power consumed to perform electrolysis. Have you worked out the math to determine the efficiency of this setup?
drewhastheinternet 1 year ago
@drewhastheinternet As you would know efficiency calcs have numerous variables pressure, temperature and relationship to sea level. Without getting into too much detail here Faraday's unity would be around 140Watt per litre minute (SATP). Our systems operate from 160 to 200 watts per litre minute.
It's common for people to focus on Faraday and forget about the unique combustion characteristics of the gas, which is not like other para-magentic mixes of hydrogen.
hohcells 1 year ago
IS this thing actually running on a hydrogen and oxygen mixture? Combining thoes two gasses in the proportions generated through electrolysis is extremely dangerous. I can remember shattering glass test tubes and deafening everyone in the classroom experimenting with the flammability of hydrogen and oxygen mixtures.
drewhastheinternet 1 year ago
@drewhastheinternet . Yes. This gas has everything it needs to combust. Usual safety and precautions should be observed at all times, particularly when students are involved. It is a wonderful teaching aid to experiment with this gas and its production processes but you need to have safe equipment, come on not glass.
hohcells 1 year ago
Hi! I am planning to install a HOH cell on my car. I would like to reduce the fuel consumption by at least 30%. I can link the computer to the car and retrieve L/min fuel consumption. Do you think that making the 30% of that value and substituting the volume with a HOH cell with that output I will reach my goal?
I mean: If I install a cell that makes 3 L/min, can I check numerically before installing it that that volume will be enough to cover the 30% of gas requierements of my engine? Thx!!
wadelacme 1 year ago
@wadelacme Each engine, cell, driver, tuning is different in many ways so it is impossible to give specifics. I can talk to the data we collect and tune for, which is between 1%-5% for 10%-40% increase in combustion efficiency. You will need to keep a close eye on NOX.
hohcells 1 year ago