2008 Creation Evidence Expo, Part 1 of 3

Dr. Willie Dye was a featured guest speaker at the 2008 Creation Evidence Expo held in Indianapolis, Indiana and also visits the Trinity Broadcasting Network and WXNT 1480 AM. Part one of three.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• creation
• evidence
• expo
• giants
• Dr. Willie Dye
• Noah's Ark
• archaeology
• pre-flood
• Genesis
• Christian
• evolution
• Darwin
• biology
• atheist

[5tonyvvvv]

@stubabyq Atheist morons need to learn basic chemistry and Homochirality if they life could happen by chance and time,first life by chance would be its own Paradox..and could never happen..science has reached a dead end..only stubborn atheist think it can happen purely by time and chance,even evolution scientists know simple chemicals cant make life..proteins will only use the LEFT handed variety of amino acids DNA and RNA only use RIGHT.together they are TOXIC TO LIFE!!!!!!

[creationliberty]

I got to meet, and speak along side of, all these men and more last Sept (2010). We took Dr. Bruce Malone to that very TBN studio, and recorded some creation segments that you will be able to see soon on TBN. We had a great time. I'll be posting the entire expo videos as soon as they are done being produced.

[fastfashn]

"Man has no ability to create anything. He can only take what exists and transform it. Science is shortsighted because it attempts to explain infinitesimal situations from a finite view. God only knows some secrets and reveals them to whom He can trust--usually His prophets."

Prophets? Long-bearded, long-haired fanatics that would see you dead if you blaspheme? There was a reason that Israel wanted kings instead of religious judges, and you know how bad kings are.

[Imaginefree69]

The basic problem is that NONE of the people who attack evolution have actually studied it. If they did, they would of course see that there's nothing TO attack. It isn't a Satanic Conspiracy, it's simply the description of a process, providing a very useful taxonomy and a way to understand relationships. I see no way around this problem of ignorance. And it will become far worse if we allow these untutored people to drag our science education back into the bronze age.

[stubabyq]

Read Genesis 9:13-17

[guitar860]

why?

[stubabyq]

You assume much. First of all I am a preacher. Second of all the Bible is not interpreted by someone and told to me. Religions are man's search for God. Christianity is God's search for man. This is the fundamental difference. It is not a philosophy; it is a relationship with the Most High God. You are confusing yourself with things you have heard and have not studied. Evidence of the earth being round has always been in Genesis 26:10. Study your Bible.

[stubabyq]

1 Corinthians 2:9-12 (NKJV) "But as it is written: Eye has not seen, nor ear heard, Nor have entered into the heart of man The things which God has prepared for those who love Him.

But God has revealed them to us through His Spirit. For the Spirit searches all things, yes, the deep things of God.

For what man knows the things of a man except the spirit of the man which is in him?" Lightening is not significant however, a rainbow is - Genesis 9:13-17

[topher696969]

You can believe in God, that is fine-But here is the thing, your religion is fundamentally flawed. who do you think created religion, people. Even if the bible really is the word of god it was written by a person- it was translated by a person it was edited by a person, the "real" meaning is then interpreted and told to you. Considering this why would you blindly trust the bible or your preacher? flat Earth?sun rotates around Earth?People living with dinosaurs?ark w/ millions of animals?...

[guitar860]

No it doesnt, it explains situations - any situations- from a naturalistic perspective because "GOD" is not a testable hypothesis. "Infinity" is the PHYSICAL state of nothingness. God doesnt need evidence, and is not subject to evidence. How convienent. By your logic, you would attribute lightening to God also, were science not working from a realistic perspective. Do you argue the cause of lightening? Im thinking lightening has less implications for your faith.