Kent hovind Big bang,Big Dud-part 4.

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
990 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Ratings have been disabled for this video.

Uploaded by on Apr 6, 2008

kent

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (jesusLostChildren777)

  • 10.000 dollar is a old price,he gives now 250.000 dollar for proof.

see all

All Comments (14)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Also, second law of thermodynamics only applies to closed systems, i.e no energy gets in or out. Biological organisms are NOT closed systems so the law doesn't apply, they are constantly exchanging energy with their surroundings.

  • That conservation of angular momentum thing is crap. Firstly I'm pretty sure the Big Bang theory doesn't actually say the singularity was spinning, and secondly even if it was, it isn't an EXPLOSION, it was an expansion (a very rapid one) . That would imply that there was something to explode into, and also that the planets were just thrown out of the big bang. They took millions of years to form. Again this demonstrates he really doesn't understand what he is trying to discredit.

  • @freakinrightman i guess when you bring the bible into it, i can see how my ideas wouldn't be relevant from your perspective.

  • @botbydblud i can absolutely see that happening at some point.

  • @freakinrightman there are no definites when it comes to the unknown, hence why it's called the unknown. the idea that you would base any decisions on "faith" as you call it seems illogical. i understand that we are all looking for the same answer in this life...."why do we exist?" religion tries to answer this question, science tries to answer this question...but neither are needed to. we are all here -in existence- simply to exist. nothing more or less.

  • "God made it that way to make the Big Bang look stupid!" wow does it get any more condescending than that?

    First, it's an unfounded assumption not unlike most assumptions creationists make about their god.

    Second, because it's an assumption you could make any assumption about what god decided to make look stupid:

    "god planted evidence of evolution to make creationism look stupid!"

    see... ^ an appeal to ridicule, so I must be right!

    Fuckin' Kent Hovind lmao

  • im surprised there are people out there who take his opinion for fact...why is atheism a religon?

  • Yep, and alot of them have come true already, and more of them will come like the one-world government and currency (all prophesied in the bible) and a number that identifies us all, its already starting. You've got to be ready for those prophecies man.

  • I suggest you stick to your prophecies.

  • 2nd law of thermodynamics is where evolution stops. Otherwise its not a law and science is BS to you? Thats just one of the laws contradicting this stupid theory

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more