WTC7 collapse compared with NIST's impact damage model

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,841
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 28, 2008

WTC7 collapse compared with NIST's best estimate impact damage model

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • NIST is all bought and paid for by the Bush-Cheney administration.Don't expect anything factual.

see all

All Comments (3)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I dont need a model to show me that the explanation we were given for 911 was bull shit the chances of three buildings falling in a controlled demolition brought on by 2 planes is IMPOSSIBLE my brain hurts every time I hear some so called expert trying to spread the lies , some people are so conditioned to believe lies you could have crashed a balloon from the maceys parade into one of the buildings and had 10 buildings fall and they would still call me stupid for believing it didnt.

  • read the NIST WTC7 coverup more closely.

    you are comparing FEA's from inside the building without the outer shell / perimeter walls.

    I only shows what NIST belives happened inside the building.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more