Defense of Substance Dualism against QualiaSoup, part 1
Loading...
Loading...
3,605
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- 10:18Defense of Substance Dualism against QualiaSoup...by migkillertwo1,346 views
- 8:38QualiaSoup's video lacks substance.by legodesi2,530 views
- 9:56Substance Dualism *Mirror*by FlyingFree33316,661 views
- 9:53Why Didn't Anybody Tell Me?by philhellenes152,508 views
- 5:54QualiaSoup's Strawman: Irreducible Complexityby onceforgivennowfree1,483 views
- 10:01dear QualiaSoupby selftrance2,036 views
- 8:12Flawed Thinking by Numbers by QualiaSoupby AClssicRkr1,903 views
- 6:00Betting on infinityby TheraminTrees115,505 views
- 5:12Mind-Brain Dualismby ProfMTH25,551 views
- 9:01Absolutely... notby QualiaSoup79,547 views
- 2:15Dualism - Mind vs. Brainby reflect79,658 views
- 10:18Substance Dualism Is Retardedby urbster1394 views
- 0:28Short refutation of Sola Scriptura (Re: Monica ...by migkillertwo1,044 views
- 6:58Defense of Substance Dualism against QualiaSoup...by migkillertwo2,542 views
- 2:42Defending dualismby Theology1O1103 views
-
QualiaSoupChannel22 videos
- 10:01Skewed views of scienceby QualiaSoup202,229 views
- 5:13Critical Thinkingby QualiaSoup411,686 views
- 3:57Three Minute Philosophy: Rene Descartesby CollegeBinary360,375 views
- 7:00Hell: an excessive punishmentby QualiaSoup113,971 views
- 4:23Richard Dawkins & Questions About Subjective Co...by 2bsirius2,983 views
I don't think you understand the term "deconstruct".
KWrestler21 2 months ago
Alright, I watched.
Care to define substance?
What's your point in referring to the statement of red light being a certain measurement of wavelength? I don't really see anything pertinent being suggested here.
On the concept of subjective personal reality, where are you going to be when neuroscience is able to tell what people are thinking? You're fighting a losing battle against time.
CrazyBluePrime 3 months ago
It seems like you're creating definitions and then declaring that your opposition has not explained them rather than giving an account to support your views. I'll continue watching, but this is my initial impression given the three 'discrepancies' that you list.
CrazyBluePrime 3 months ago
substance dualism is a very naive position to hold; for instance to hold it you are denying that there is a problem in the interaction between 2 different substance, one which is extensible and can be broken down, and another which is inextensible and is fundamentaly so different that it may as well not exist for all the interacting with the physical substance it can do.
beastzerkerjet 3 months ago
Garbage video.
OrmazdX34 4 months ago
Boy, with defenders like this, substance dualism needs no enemies.
hetgroenegif 6 months ago
Nobody's saying you OUGHT to adopt determinism, simply that it's true.
Venaloid 9 months ago
Well done. For a different take on this you might want to see my #22, and #25. However, just because the attack on substance dualism is fallacious does not mean that we are 2 entities. Rather the human person is a unity with material and immaterial aspects. Peace, DP
dfpolis 10 months ago
this is stupid
ryan4144 1 year ago
@migkillertwo Your arguments and points are flawed. Nice try though. Trying to refute QS will take more than just that.
12InchesUnBuffed 1 year ago