Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

New Energy Series 1: Tom Bearden

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
60,813
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 18, 2007

Nuclear engineer and scalar energy theorist discusses Tesla, Maxwell, regauging, Poynting flow, back EMF, virtual particle flux of the vacuum, general relativity and other exotic topics in electrodynamics. Not for the technically timid!

Some men talk about saving the planet.
These men are doing something about it.

The New Energy Series

Featuring
Tom Bearden, John Hutchison, Joseph Newman, Troy Reed, and Dennis Lee.

Meet some courageous inventors and scientists who are finally willing to reveal their cutting-edge technologies to the world. Discover the New Science that will revolutionize human civilization. Step into the private worlds of some of today's most exciting inventors and engineers. Explore their laboratories. Examine their theories. Look at their machines. See technologies that power cars, levitate canon balls, and produce clean, non-polluting "zero point" energy ­ now acknowledged by physicists to exist in all space as a "running river" of infinite, accessible electromagnetic energy.

Take an in-depth, up-close, personal look at each inventor and his work. View never-before-seen footage of some phenomenal experiments. This is a rare opportunity to learn about this fascinating work, with the sense of intimacy that only the medium of video delivers --­ an opportunity not to be missed.

  • likes, 17 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • @VERGIS92 Anyone who would actually pick over the garbage he's spewing would realize it's meaningless. It SOUNDS techy, uses techy words, but means nothing at all.

    "When you apply a transductional field to a non-linear charge distribution, the result is a flux - what we call a "rational" flux which in turns provides an electromagnetic force. This force can then be used, by harnessing the relativistic wave function, to power a motor."

    See? I can make stuff up too.

  • @paddlefoot13 LOL nuclear engineer. His "PhD" is from "Trinity College and University, a British institution with no building, campus, faculty, or president, and run from a post office box in Sioux Falls, South Dakota" which offers "fast degrees" for "life experience".

    i.e. you pay, they give you whatever you want.

    I have a real PhD from the University of Ottawa. It actually exists and it took 5 years to get!

see all

All Comments (253)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @motionapplied Um... ok that's terrific. Happy web surfing.

  • @somedudeinva ...artificially produce the need for those minesweepers. And during this only energy, money and time's wasted + nature's being polluted and lives of other humans put at stake.

  • @somedudeinva or let's take Honeywell Regelsysteme, Maintal and Junghans Feinwerktechnik, Schramberg who also produce igniters for landmines - while other companies in Germany produce minesweeping-vehicles (w w w . diehl . c o m). First the products are developed that then ...

  • @somedudeinva ...conservation of energy since there are no absolutely isolated systems inside the universe (and we don't know whether it has or hasn't absolute borders) and there's no loss nor gain of energy. the only gain that appears is the gain for us humans - we can use more energy than before. but as the u.s. shows: they are energy spoilers. energy extra gets tapped from nature - just to drive lights, televisions, etc. that aren't used but stay on while the people are out of the house.

  • @somedudeinva we can only tap nature, transform this energy onto different degrees of the scale dimension (where most of it stays unused and is a side-product) and store it for a very limited time. there's no absolute ...

  • @somedudeinva ...conductor is in a very "cold" context). i want to know something more about nature. you waste your time on people like bearden that cannot be understood that easily and leave too much room for way too many interpretations. he didn't put on the straitjacket of imagination that is necessary to do science (compression of many phenomena to one general description - so that it can be used on new phenomena - and to predict phenomena that maybe have been there all of the time before).

  • @somedudeinva your statement doesn't talk about nature. it doesn't point at certain phenomena that might be new for me. it doesn't lead me to watch phenomena which i already know from a different angle or distance or under different circumstances (like supraconductivity that appears when the ...

  • what kind of energy isn't free - since we always tap nature. couldn't we additionally produce dipoles and then tap some of the energy that's being released during those dipoles getting neutral again? oh wait! we already do that. the bigger problem is: we only do that with a very limited amount of all the phenomena that we have found out to exist.

  • @motionapplied I only said that so you could find it, not because I was bragging. "Top comment" in youtube is hardly bragging rights.

    You still haven't said what's wrong with my statement.

  • @somedudeinva "top comment" ... by ten users. it's as if the members of the jewish society should´ ve really believed in the comments and the ratings that were made about them in germany some years ago. you can't give no reason but ony use circular logic and point at your statement being "top commented". i'll better stick to 8.03 and finishing feynman's 3rd part of lectures on physics than turning in a circle with you. but you go on and have fun in here.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more