Celebs And Animal Rights

Various celebs talk about why animal rights are important

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

• anime
• celebrities
• your
• mommy
• kills
• animals

[joshuak47]

LetPetaBurn:

The only difference between "killer" and "murderer" is from what species you take life. You will still look like a psycho to me when you shoot an animal's mother and cut her open.

And if I killed you and made good use of all your body parts, possessions and money, that WOULD NOT JUSTIFY THE KILL.

And respect does not equal "kill." I can imagine you saying "I really like this new country album. In order to show the artist respect, I think I will go kill him."

[Buguanshishi]

This hypocrical,self-deceptive, shallow-minded fool should not take a painkiller is she has a headache, not take a flu med if she has a cold, she should not take anti-biotic is she suffers infection. She should not take anaethesia when go for tooth extraction. She cannot go for an operation if she needs one. She cannot take stitches if she suffers a cut because stitching an open wound has been tested on animals. All these animals testings have saved mankind's lives. Hypocrite!

[flootisboy65]

Of course they don't plot and they don't conive because they are animals and they don't have the brains to be so devious, but they do kill each other because that's an animal instinct, but if they ever had brains like humans they would do the same shit to each we do. As been stated real life ain't like Walt Disney.

[joshuak47]

@jumpthenoob

If you don't have an argument, feel free to keep quiet instead of showing rage and looking like a silly man.

[jumpthenoob]

@joshuak47 okay. well tell me this. deer are extremely overpopulated. know why? human corn,bean,soy, etc fields. wanna know how they keep from starving to death? hunters. eat shit peta fucker

[kimberlily1983]

@Buguanshishi Hmm, to follow your logic, I guess vegans/animal rights activists are not allowed to drink water, as that's been tested on animals. Seems to me water was around a long time before sadists decided to inflict cruelty on animals with it...

Just because a drug has been tested on animals, doesn't mean animal testing has had anything whatsoever to do with its development.

[Zachrys]

@L1A1Rocker Right on.

[L1A1Rocker]

@crabfishlion Really? Have you EVER seen a "father" deer comfort his offspring? No? Care to guess why? Cause he hit the road looking for another peace of. . . Ever seen a momma deer comfort her sartled baby? Why? Cause she took off running in the a different direction than the baby. Or maybe watched a momma kick her baby away from he food so she can eat her fill first? Really, you MAY know about biology but you are seriously lacking in animal and human behavior.

[Beanmaster73]

we evolved to eat animal protein and plants/ herbs etc- we are opportunistic feeders- it is not morally wrong to kill and eat animals- it is however wrong to raise and slaughter these animals in a factory type setting where they cannot move about freely and be fed natural diets-

[xXSPOILERALERTXx]

What is this animals are kind and good and animal if provoked even if unprovoked will attack you and many forget humans are animals and we have similar instincts there for we both have the urge and need to kill.

[babbrookkennel]

Our pets especially our dogs. Can form very strong bonds. They feel, they love, they protectm and keep us company. BUT!! Many of the Animals rights activist today. have learned that there is a lot of money involved through sympathetic donations. Because of these we have Animal Rights activism that has gone over board. They are wrongly Generalizing entire groups as Animal abusers and causing witch hunts and lynch mobs. This harms both humans and animals. Because it forces an extreme division.

[Flimpofloempieflomp]

It is the 'last resort' so to say to start chowing down on members of the pack/group/family (or am i completely wrong about this).

And about the subject of disassociation, have you heard about the Korean couple? I think it's just a sign of the times. People are to busy with themselves.