Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Tim Carney On Ron Paul Foreign Policy: "It's Not Isolationism"!

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
5,238
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 21, 2011

Airing Date Feb.21, 2011

Tim Carney On Ron Paul Foreign Policy: "It's Not Isolationism"!

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • How refreshing to have someone (other than Ron Paul) set the record straight here.

  • Thanks, Carney!

see all

All Comments (60)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Fox news does NOT want Paul as president. They've often said he is an "isolationist" and he can't win. I worry about legalizing drugs, but Ron Paul's outstanding views on other issues is worth taking a chance. I figure drug-users will find what drug they want, legal or not. As far as people calling Paul and "isolationist" Anti-immigrant or intelligent? Before you post, check out this YouTube video about poverty/immigration entitled:

    Immigration by the Numbers -- Off the Charts

  • @bobshenix this social element has been ignored in nazi eugenics, or rather people have been unscientific about it in their support of nazi eugenics, using faulty logic via fallacies and incomplete experimentation and study of the subjects, some of this can be blamed on a lack of understanding of what genes actually do, since only a few people even were guessing at them at that point in time, we don't engage in the kinds of behaviour the nazis did because we know the social elements better now

  • @bobshenix seriously, look up the science on the matter, no not a couple of websites, look into the actual science by actual functional scientists who are actually doing legitimate controls on their experiments and in the field, science is always combating philosophy because philosophy is about guessing something then trying to prove it correct and science is about finding something and then trying to figure out what the most likely answer is eugenics has always had a social element, lol

  • @bobshenix eugenics is more to do with genes and some common sense stuff, what we saw in the 30's was what happens when philosophy and ideology hijack sciences for their own uses, you've heard of the term "soviet science", it's much of the same thing today's eugenics are not like the nazi ones very much at all, it deals with genetics and there are some basic principles behind it but if you think that's what's going on bob you've got a lot to learn about genetics... ;p sorry man you're crazy

  • Eugenics - portrayed today as outdated, backwards, evil, and unfounded DESPITE the fact that the conceptual principles are mostly common sense (however disagreeable to some); driven by a genuine desire to improve the human race, and hence societies of the future.

    Marxist egalitarian ideals have precipitated a society where government-dependent underachievers and the sexually irresponsible heavily out-breed the more productive, responsible citizens. And that's BETTER for the future of humanity??

  • @ChironUSA you know soooooooooooooooooo little about what they're talking about it's not even funny I'm glad you stopped pretending you know what you're talking about and just admitted you're using baseless rhetoric

  • @ChironUSA so noone takes them seriously, and they shouldn't, the problem is that they're forfeiting reason and so rightly so, noone cares what they think at that point I mean they're batshit crazy people, holy shit but, science, as always fixes it's own mistakes as it goes along, there are plenty of people that recognize there are other legitimate scientists who believe in a different explanation for what we're seeing but the idiots take so much time they don't have any to talk

  • @bohemianh the issue is that the general concept isn't anything other than "some genes will be more preferable and humans have some things they can do to change the frequency of certain genes within a large genepool of individuals

    what do you think dog breeding is?

    anyways, I'm all for keeping the pseudo-science out of this whole thing, eugenics however has a similar issue with climate change you're right, the only people that would say "hold on stop this is going bad places" act like idiots

  • @bohemianh science has always had political aspects to it because each of the scientists is not removed from politics, as for eugenics being a mainstream, the idea of eugenics is actually workable whether we like it or not, it's very pleasant but the general concept is solid,

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more