Geologic Column - Flood or Evolutionary Fantasy

New Scientific Evidence for the Flood
Genesis 7:20
The waters prevailed fifteen cubits upward, and the mountains were covered.

If there was a great world wide Flood, as described in Genesis, such a catastrophe certainly should have left obvious evidence of itself all over the world. Scientists who believe in creation say that we are surrounded by these evidences. Many of them also believe that some of the features associated with glaciers can be better explained by a catastrophic flood. While evolutionary scientists scoff at the biblical account of the Flood, they continue to run across evidences of what they take to be huge floods. Now further evidence has been reported of a continental flood.

The September 1989, issue of Geology, a scientific professional journal, carried an article about drumlins in northern Saskatchewan. Drumlins are hills that are traditionally associated with glacial activity. When viewed from the air, they resemble eggs lying on their sides, all pointing in the same direction.

Over the last few years some scientists have proposed that drumlins were formed by large quantities of water running in the same direction. The article in Geology offers yet more evidence for large quantities of water moving over the continental land surfaces. One of the scientists remarked that, "There's nothing in recorded history that matches the size of these floods."

If we consider Genesis to be recorded history, rather than ancient and ignorant myth, there certainly is an historical record of a huge Flood!

http://www.drdino.com/letting-god-create-your-day.php

Prayer: Dear Lord, in our age of unbelief, so many don't even feel they need to apologize for rejecting Your Word as ancient myths. Help me, along with all of Your people, to be bright, shining lights for Your truth in this dark world. In Jesus' Name. Amen.

References: R. Monastersky, Hills point to catastrophic Ice Age floods, Science News, September 30, 1989, p. 213.


The Channeled Scablands; Scientific Bias Against Catastrophism. "In the end, the truth of catastrophism did win, but it took more than 50 years to see the project through. And this was despite the fact that the event in question was relatively easy to document through field observations." E. K. Peters, No Stone Unturned: Reasoning About Rocks and Fossils, 1991, pp. 78 and 84. http://nwcreation.net/scablands.html.

The Geologic Column: Does It Exist? - http://www.trueorigin.org/geocolumn.asp .

Does The Geologic Column Prove Evolution? - http://www.icr.org/article/1130 .

Ten Misconceptions about the Geologic Column - http://www.icr.org/article/242 .

Cooling of the Ocean After the Flood -http://www.icr.org/article/406 .

How Long Did It Take to Deposit the Geologic Strata? - http://www.icr.org/article/2478/107 .

Quotes by Evolutionary Scientists Against Evolution - http://www.warneveryone.com/evolution_scientists_quotes.htm

Live broadcasting with instant message - http://www.justin.tv/warneveryone

KJV1611 Bible - http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=authorizedversion&search=Search

The Institute for Creation Research equips believers with evidences of the Bible's accuracy and authority through scientific research, educational programs, and media presentations, all conducted within a thoroughly biblical framework.
info@icr.org
http://www.icr.org

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• crxxxev
• geology
• creation
• evolution

[ndrthrdr1]

Evolution reality.

[realscience1]

@labrat1807 lol! sorry about that!

[gregrutz]

My field is Geology.. & it's either flood or floods.. we all agree on that.

Bull Shit ! Geologists went looking for evidence for a flood hundreds of years ago, they didn't find any. They found fossils and an old earth, get over it.

[gregrutz]

@MajesticCyru ) How does sand & coral in the sedimentary layers disprove flood.

NOT ALL SEDIMENTARY ROCKS ARE FORMED BY WATER.

FLOODS DON'T MAKE DISTINCT LAYERS OF DIFFERENT KINDS OF ROCK.

FLOODS DON'T SORT FOSSILS.

WHERE DID 29,000 FEET OF WATER GO?

[gregrutz]

@MajesticCyru The earth is 4,545 million years old dummy.

And yes there was more Oxygen millions of years ago.

Redioactive decay does not change just to fit a 2000 years old book.

Geologist know the earth was old before radiometric dating was invented.

They also proved there was no global flood.

You are not a scientist, you are a brainwashed IDiot.

[MajesticCyru]

@gregrutz

1) The layers are just as it says in this creative.

2) BS... we have simply use silicates like sand 4 mineralization.

3) There is plenty of wind blown sand anywhere ...thanks to the wind.

4) The rate of radioactive decay changes when u add H2O or even just oxygen.

It is well known that their was more oxygen in the atmosphere not that long ago.

5) I employ Geologist in Sudbury Ontario.. the mineral capital of the world!!

U r not a Geologist we would hire! Your education is 2 weak!!

[MajesticCyru]

!o! @gregrutz R u also a rocket scientist.

Geologist r divided on the matter of dating ..when u have to assume the same conditions 4000 yrs ago as we c today. It's BS. Niagara Falls proves the flood 4000 yrs ago ..by rate of erosion.

I work with geologist & I have spent more money studding rocks then most families make in a year ...so I'm sure I can trust my resources like Dr. Steve Austin ...over trusting u.

Do u have anything new 2 add ..other then these outdated YT sound bights?

[gregrutz]

@MajesticCyru ''It's the same evidence viewed from different perspectives'' That is bull shit !

The people who study the rocks know the earth is million of years old.

Floods don't make slow growing coral reefs. Floods don't make different kinds of rock. Floods don't make the ash layers we find between other sedimentry layers. Plate Tectonics was proven 60 years ago, they know how fast the plates are spreading.

[gregrutz]

@MajesticCyru 1. the rocks are not all the same age, they have different fossils in them.

2. Fossils do take millions of years, just because calcite is made quickly on cowboy boots does not change the fossil record.

3. Sand is wind blown, it proves that not all sedimentary rock is from water, there was no flood.

4. Radioactive decay does not change just to fit a 2000 year old book.

The Egyptians living 7000 years ago had the same air to breath as we do!

5. You are not a Geologist.

[MajesticCyru]

eyes rolling @gregrutz ..a trap !o! That is desperate BS

1) Yes quickly through the entire GEOLOGIC COLUMN

2) Yes covered rapidly ..but it does not take yrs 4 mineralization

3) How does sand & coral in the sedimentary layers disprove flood(s)?

4) Radiometric decay is different when u add more oxygen ..which there was!

We all know that the atmospheric conditions where different just 4000 years ago!

5) My field is Geology.. & it's either flood or floods.. we all agree on that.

Nice try!! :)