Virtuoso Violinist - Paganini, Bazzini

http://www.allegrofilms.com/perlman Paganini, Bazzini played by virtuoso violinist

Category:

Music

Tags:

• classical
• itzhak
• perlman
• violin
• violinist
• paganini
• bazzini

[MimiWildflower]

appreciate the jewfro.. it probably adds to the accoustics

[NejiHyuuga777]

Wow, he truly is the greatest alive today :).

[gfportilho]

@moltoallegro19 how many there are virtuosos in the world? they are the ones that play well the slow pieces, fast pieces, or both?

[Pakornexx]

i agree wirh angrykhun. molto

allegro19 shut upppp!!! if you dont like pealman you can go away. we need litsen music. shitttt!!!!

[LucielStarz123]

Let us wish that Itzak Perlman shall live a VERY LONG LIFE!!!

[moltoallegro19]

@AngryKhan I'm not talking about mistakes (even though I think you're wrong: you can too play something to fast to make mistakes distinguishable); I am talking about quality of tone. How skilled you are and how beautiful the sound of your tone is is much more obvious in a slow piece than if you play 32-notes in MM 165. I said in, like, my second comment that we assumed that the violinist already possesed the technical skills aquired for both the slow and the fast piece.

[AngryKhan]

@moltoallegro19 i really see no difference in a slow or faster piece, unless for some reason you have trouble hearing music isnt capable of being played so fast that the ear cannot hear mistakes.

[moltoallegro19]

@AngryKhan Therefore: it's generally easier to play the faster piece of two of the same technical level.

[moltoallegro19]

@AngryKhan This is not a question in which you may agree or disagree. That is a very unfair comparison, Vivaldi's A minor concerto is a different genre and on a whole different level than the typical Paganini. I didn't say (and this is the second time I clearify this) that a slow, technically easy, piece is harder than a fast, technically difficult, piece. My point is (for the bloody third time) that your flaws become more transparent in a slow piece.

[AngryKhan]

@moltoallegro19 i disagree its much hard to play a quality paganini than say vivaldis A minor mov 2 in quality.

[moltoallegro19]

@AngryKhan It is easy to play slow music clearly - if you don't intend to play it well or interesting. Still we're talking in general here; I didn't say all slow pieces are objectively harder than every fast piace in the world. But you say it yourself: the difficulty with Paganini is the quality, not speed (I believe it's the combination, though). My point is that it's easier to hide your lacking quality in a higher speed.

[AngryKhan]

@moltoallegro19 not true, it is easy to play slow music clarity. Paganini is so difficult not because of its speed, but because of the bow technique it requires to get out all those notes crisply.