MoonFaker: Apollo Ham Sandwich. PART 2.
Loading...
Uploader Comments (WhiteJarrah)
Top Comments
-
"Tracked to the Moon and back"-claim is sinking BAD now...
I wasn't expecting this. I was thinking NASA arranged some "independent" amateurs who monitored their flight. That would have been a good proof.
2 years ago 4
-
Good job, I like it.
2 years ago 3
All Comments (30)
-
@WeWentToTheMoon69 Talk about IGNORANCE-seems to me that u talk the cake win the prize.
Tell me how AN ASCENT POD(tiny little piece of shit craft)- caught up to the CM that was doing 4000MPH around the moon & SOMEHOW was able to RENDEZ-VOUS with it at 4000MPH???? USE YOUR FUCKING BRAIN-IT'S IMPOSSIBLE MOONTARD-FUCKING IMPOSSIBLE.especally in 1969. lol they can't even do it NOW.Your ignorance is astounding. AND THEN, fly back 240,000 miles on FUMES. lol NOONE HAS EVER BEEN TO THE MOON DUMMY.
-
@amparion asshole-the lro shows NOTHING-U MOONTARD PARROTS WOULD FALL FOR ANYTHING.lol
-
@delahaye100 As JW knows but conveniently glosses over, Apollo was not continuously visible at any one station during its entire trip to the moon. And this may come as a shock to the younger readers like JW, but personal computers capable of computing Apollo's position were not available to individual hams in 1969-1972. Once Apollo reached the moon, it became easy - just point the antenna at the moon and it will bring in everything on the surface or in orbit on the near side.
-
Jarrah, ofcourse the Bochum Observatory director Tilo Elsner nowadays is working together with 'a' project with NASA. Strange? No. They are in space-business. But did Heinz Kaminski, director in 1969, do that? Nope, he did not. Because the Bochum Observatory was INDEPENDENT at the time.
-
Great work Jarrah.
-
What about the shiny dot with the long shadow? What did it look like to you?
-
no, it's for Xtremely glad i'm not you.
-
See?
Even lunar photograph showing a shiny dot with a LONGGG shadow stretching from it, just like this Aussie nitwit claimed JAXA COULD NOT make (see his job on SELENE photos), even when they GET those photos, you loonies call them "Pixellated (sic) garbage"
Maybe the Mother Ship will someday come to iake you away, and stop off at the moon so you can see the truth.
Yeah, yeah, I am SO brainwashed.
It's "sel-UH-nee", nitwit. Even in Aussie.
LOL/
Is the "X" for "eXtremely ignorant"?
- 9:38
MoonFaker: Clementine, SELENE & Telescopes. PART 3by WhiteJarrah2,470 views
- 9:18
MoonFaker: Apollo Ham Sandwich. PART 3by WhiteJarrah1,998 views
- 10:30
MoonFaker: Radioactive Anomaly. PART 15by WhiteJarrah1,911 views
- 3:08
MoonFaker: Posing For Portrait. PART 2by WhiteJarrah2,046 views
- 10:06
MoonFaker: Apollo Ham Sandwich. PART 1.by WhiteJarrah5,280 views
- 7:39
MoonFaker: Shifting Stars EMBOSSEDby WhiteJarrah2,079 views
- 10:50
MoonFaker: Radioactive Anomaly. PART 18by WhiteJarrah1,972 views
- 10:54
MoonFaker: Silent Space. PART 1.by WhiteJarrah2,820 views
- 8:46
MoonFaker: Phil Plait, Mythbusters & Dirty Tricks. PART 4by WhiteJarrah2,255 views
- 10:10
MoonFaker: LRO, Moment Of Truth?by WhiteJarrah30,297 views
- 5:45
MoonFaker: The Exhibit B Addendumby WhiteJarrah3,011 views
- 10:43
MoonFaker: Double Shot. Part 2by RankoFanatic4,099 views
- 7:10
MoonFaker: Footprints On The Moon Set, Ralph René Was Correct! PART 2by WhiteJarrah5,321 views
- 10:20
MoonFaker: Exhibit D. PART 9.by WhiteJarrah2,950 views
- 6:13
MoonFaker: Exhibit C. PART 8by WhiteJarrah2,996 views
- 2:19
MoonFaker: Leapin' Lunatics. PART 2by WhiteJarrah2,546 views
- 9:04
MoonFaker: No Crater. PART 4by WhiteJarrah5,204 views
- 9:29
Moonfaker: Exhibit A. PART 2by WhiteJarrah9,193 views
- 10:50
MoonFaker: All Bets Are On, Part 1by PepsiAddict184,358 views
- 8:09
MoonFaker: The Flags Are Alive. PART 3.by WhiteJarrah6,852 views
"Both of which are NASA facilities and thus, should not be counted as independent verification".
Jarrah, how about the Bochum Observatory in Germany? From 1957 until the mid-seventies the station received transmissions from both Soviet and American space-vehicles. It picked up and recorded several Apollo missions. The observatory received some of the CTV transmissions from the Rovers on the moon, as well as telemetry such as biomedical data and also voice-transmissions.
Rob260259 2 years ago
Bochum Observatory is discussed in Part 4.
watch?v=-LVeKGfORvc
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
Once again:
where are all the scientists that doubt the moonlandings of Apollo?
Why is it that only a few YouTube-detectives, conspiracy-theorists and political distrusters believe in this ridiculous hoax?
Do you know?
Rob260259 2 years ago
"where are all the scientists that doubt the moonlandings of Apollo?"
I already told you that David Groves has a PhD and Bill Wood has a BCs. Both doubt Apollo.
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
True Delahaye. It wouldn't surprise me if Jarrah makes a video using text from the bible and shows it to us as 'proof' for the 'fakery of NASA'.
Rob260259 2 years ago
"It wouldn't surprise me if Jarrah makes a video using text from the bible and shows it to us as 'proof' for the 'fakery of NASA'."
I challenge you to provide a shred of evidence that I follow the bible or use pieces from it to prove Apollo was faked. Otherwise retract this statement. People who know me personally know that I am an atheist.
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago