From a lecture given by Dr. Milton Friedman in Erie, Pennsylvania (1978).
This is essentially a restatement of the "parable of the broken window." This fallacy has been known since at least 1850 ...
From a lecture given by Dr. Milton Friedman in Erie, Pennsylvania (1978).
This is essentially a restatement of the "parable of the broken window." This fallacy has been known since at least 1850 when French theorist Frédéric Bastiat published a pamphlet entitled, "That Which is Seen and That Which is Not Seen." You can read it here: http://tiny.cc/eyAp8
It was popularized in 1946 by economist Henry Hazlitt in an important book called, "Economics in One Lesson." It can be downloaded for free from the Foundation for Economic Education here: http://www.fee.org/pdf/books/Economic...
Stossel also has a great article about this fallacy under yet another guise known as "Cash for Clunkers." Read it here: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/arti...
From CNN Money / Fortune Magazine: "Cash for Clunkers. It was a well-intentioned plan that was supposed to increase consumer confidence, spur fuel efficiency, jump-start the auto industry, and help create American jobs.
Instead it disproportionately benefited foreign car companies, which create fewer North American jobs per auto dollar than the Detroit Three do. And sales came mostly from inventory, doing little to increase production and jobs.
What's more, by junking clunkers, the program removed many low-end vehicles from the used-car market, running up prices for the lower-income people who'd normally buy them. So we hurt the people most in need of help, while throwing taxpayer dollars down the drain. " http://money.cnn.com/2009/11/16/news/...
The last paragraph above is the most important. A well-intentioned plan that hurt the very people it was intended to help? That's what almost every government program does. To find out one of the reasons why, watch this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uyW8US...
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Sorry, i got tired "He can sell the machinery to the owner of the mine". Which will mean the miner will be replaced; the miner can become an operator though and the owner can better compete. What you're buying is the equivalent of the forger's labor in your example. The problem is; when money is inflated; there is an overdemand; then a bust. The owner can overextend; then once money's value resets the demand drops. Every owner that received this money suffers extreme losses.
Look at it this way, when you produce, you're selling your LABOR, to create something. A miner is hired to mine resource. A forger can use this resource that he purchases (covering the miner and resource costs) to create something of value, let's say , machinery. He then sells the machinery at the price he paid, and an extra for his labour. He can sell the machinery to replace the owner of the mine; to raise efficiency to allow a lower price. It's a continous price lowering cycle.
Um, let's see: real wages and per-capita energy consumption in the West have been stagnant for over a generation. We're fighting resource wars and facing economic collapse. The economies that are growing right now are horribly overpopulated and engaged in widespread environmental destruction. So-called "free market" capitalism over the last thirty years has rewarded stagnation and environmental destruction and the creation of a huge underclass of people completely dependent on the state.
Okay one more: the implications of the real wage statement are completely false. Wages have flattened becasue workers have demanded more in benefits. Total compensation in real terms has never fallen in over 40 years and living standards (before this latest crisis) have continued to rise. We face no economic collapse (beyond that created by govt) and neither massive overpopulation or environmental destruction are waiting in the wings.
Couldn;t let this pass either. Capitalism has done more to bring people out of grinding poverty than any force in all of human history. It is the welfare state (exactly the opposite of capitalism) that has created an entrenched underclass and, still, the US has embraced capitalism sufficiently that we have the wealthiest poor in the world - comparable to Europe's middle class in many ways.
Human beings have historically died and fought and killed each other off whenever scarcity has become a problem. Alternative resources are frequently worse, and leave future generations worse off. Existing capital must frequently be destroyed or cannibalized to make way for new means of production. More negative externalities completely ignored by economic theory.
Certainly human beings have fought over resources in the past - that alters nothing that I've said. That alternative resources are frequently worse is a value judgment on your part completely at odds with the judgment of virtually everyone else on the planet. That capital is converted from one form to another is not problematic. The most common means of capital creation is to convert resources to something with more use value via the application of labor - a point you can't grasp.
Sigh. Got better things to do. I've tried to get you to realize the fallacious nature of your position but faith is a tough nut to crack. You can continue to maintain that the elimination of some resources creates externalities and that we're in some kind of resource death spiral diminishing each future generation, but since that is so at odds with reality all you'll accomplish is having those coming across your statements view you as nothing but a fool...
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Wouldn't spending also be production?
For example, if i spend money by hiring a cable guy to make a new cable, isn't that also producing an additional cable?
Every case of spending is purchasing the production of someone else - not the production itself.
You are merely a tin foil hat alarmist.
Your view is based on nothing but fallacies.
Ta ta...
...and rightly so.
Goodnight.