3-CARD MONTE AT VEGAS DEBATE WON'T STOP HILLARY'S FREE FALL:
The CNN post-Vegas-debate analysis was as simplistic and insulting as was the underlying clinton-machine scheme.
Missus clinton was exposed as unprincipled and dumb in the previous debate in Philadelphia. Scripted answers, a stacked audience, setup questions, clinton shills posing as pundits, Spitzer muzzled, and an empty "no" cannot put "unprincipled" and "dumb" back in the box.
Just as she flunked the DC Bar exam, flunked the only managerial job she ever had (heading health care reform), missus clinton flunked her only real vetting in the campaign to date: the last debate. An empty pantsuit but for the arrogance and hate.
The clintons will try to quash the Tim Russerts (and they probably will), but no matter. The clinton jackboot is irrelevant here. Her opponents and the new media AND THE PEOPLE will ask her the hard questions. Russert opened the door.
It's already starting. No doubt pressured by the clintons, old media are trying to reverse the momentum, trying to put Humpty Dumpty back together again. (CNN's original headline "CLINTON'S POLL SUPPORT SLIPS AFTER WEEK OF ATTACKS" quickly became: "A YEAR FROM ELECTION DAY, CLINTON REMAINS PERSON TO BEAT")
What old media are missing is that the last debate was no aberration.
Missus clinton is not capable of straight answers. It's not simply that she's 'a congenital liar,' to quote Bill Safire. It's that the truth will bury her.
Moreover, she is not capable of thinking off-script, on her feet, out-of-the-box.
As Carl Bernstein said the other day, "I think if there is a watershed moment... in the campaign that has interrupted this notion of inevitibility, that debate was probably it.... Hillary Rodham Clinton has had a difficult relationship to the truth."
He says her campaign has been designed to partly to help her avoid such questions, "and now they will have been unsuccessful at avoiding it. And that's what the campaign represents -- a failure to keep that question from coming front and center."
LOOK FOR HILLARY CLINTON'S FASCISTIC MOVES TO INTENSIFY.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjMNoC...
What the hell was the last part of the video about? If they have not committed a crime you cannot punish them! Also, Cheney admitted we still have not evidence that Bin Laden planned the towers.
carhac66 3 years ago
1/2
Play 'Virtual Kill' (YouTube). Pay close attention to Michael Scheuer, head of the CIA bin Laden division UNDER CLINTON.
Scheuer: "Bin Laden is alive today because Mr. Clinton, Mr. Sandy Berger, and Mr. Richard Clarke refused to kill him. That's the bottom line.
Read Richard Miniter, 'Losing Bin Laden: How Bill Clinton's Failures Unleashed Global Terror.'
miat1111 3 years ago
2/2
Get informed. If not for yourself, for your kids.
It would be sheer insanity to put the clintons back in the Oval Office. We will not survive another clinton. (Indeed, we may yet not survive the first.)
miat1111 3 years ago
P.S. 1/2
You write: "If they have not committed a crime you cannot punish them!"
The clintons constrained by laws? Give me a break.
That said, the terrorist acts were not 'crimes.' They were acts of war. Not understanding this difference, not understanding that we were at war throughout their tenure, is one of the clintons' fundamental failures.
miat1111 3 years ago
P.S. 2/2
A terrorist war requires only one consenting player. When a terrorist declares war on you, and commits acts of war against you, you are perforce at war. You have 2 options. Fight. Or surrender.
The clintons surrendered. Repeatedly.
miat1111 3 years ago