RE: iMacs can game with Vista and ATI Radeon HD 4850

Video response to vicious dave

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Apple
• mac
• imac
• Microsoft
• PC
• Vista
• ppc
• OSX
• gaming
• opengl
• directx
• computer
• computing
• balmer
• win7
• windows7
• sl
• leopard
• tiger
• xp

[Eggyrocks1]

The only thing you're getting me to compare is the price. Nobody is forcing you to buy a Mac. I'm not sure why you think people buy a Mac just for gaming.

Also, I fail to see why some people can't see the difference between 'playing Crysis' and 'maxing Crysis'. Not all of us are bothered about maxing all of the settings.

Wow, you paid $700 for a computer running Windows; now that's worth money! (that was sarcasm).

[codebean]

Look at the orginal video bro Dave's clearly ranting about how you can game on a mac, yes you can but look at how much you have to pay to do so.

Yeah coz paying thousands of dollars more on a computer is really worth, you're tool for letting some one trick you into thinking that & taking all your money!

[ASCII808]

wow I did not think the mobile version is that bad, lol when emeek challenges me he might get owned regardless that he has an i7.

[codebean]

Yeah emeek spouts on too much about the 4850, his last vid on it was absolutely crap!

[pacorocks1]

@0oNitroKid0o work of art? the fuck? am i gonna be staring at the mac pro 24/7? i could care less what my computer looks like.

[swisscheesepotatochi]

go ahead elitist faggot

[0oNitroKid0o]

I would pay that much money for an iMac without the computer in it because it is a work of art and your pc is not

[codebean]

Not only that but there are more than just Dell when it comes to AIO. Granted apple may make some of the best AIO if not the best, but you've proved nothing because that isn't what this vid is about in 1st place. If u want to prove something the find me a mac for $700 that fits my criteria, else there's nothing left to say.

Youtube is full of "spam" so no need for apologies ;)

[codebean]

I'm not talking about screen res dude like I said your completely way off subject thats y I said take a look at the video. It was originally about how someone stated macs suck for gaming & they do you pay a shit load more just to get to have the ability to game on a mac, pc users have the choice of not having to fork out extra money on a all in one just to own a mid range/level computer a choice u dont ave wit apple & they suck because of that! Its simple get it thru ur head!

[Eggyrocks1]

Communications; Dell: no bluetooth as standard, not even an option in purchase. iMac: standard all the way. Ethernet; iMac 10/100/1000. Dell: 10/100.

Display: Dell < iMac for viewing angles.

Dell: Hmm. iMac: IPS technology, wide view angle. Apologies for "spammng" your video, but I just proved a point. You're trying to compare two entirely different machines aimed at two entirely different markets. And I'm sure the Dell would cost a lot more to get the same features of the iMac in my comparison.

[Eggyrocks1]

Next up, screen resolution. On the iMac is full HD 1080p. On the Dell, 1366x768 AND you need to pay the full £1,039 to get the touch screen. Memory: DDR3 on iMac, DDR2 on the Dell. Hard drive space: 1TB on the iMac, 500GB on the Dell. Video card: 9400M on the Dell, 4670 (dedicated) on the iMac. Wireless: 802.11N standard on the iMac, b/g on the Dell.

Dell: no built in microphone. iMac; all standard. Dell: combo drive (is blu-ray, but you can't burn normal DVDs). iMac; superdrive.

[Eggyrocks1]

I've seen the original video; that video brought me to this one. Also, you aren't paying thousands of dollars more for a Mac. Take Dell's consumer all-in-one; Dell Studio One. It's high-end model costs £1,039 (ignore currency, doesn't matter). Let's take a look at the mid-end iMac model; that costs £1199. Not much difference, but let's see what you get for each. With the Dell, you get 2.93GHz; with iMac, 3.06GHz. Not much difference, but the iMac's is the next "model" up.