WTC Fires and the Collapse (Part Two)

Did fire really cause the collapse of the WTCs?

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• wtc
• 9/11
• 911
• tower
• flight
• trade
• north
• fire
• jet
• fuel
• Edna
• Cintron
• south
• conspiracy
• terrorist
• bush

[muzicmaker2001]

@bellijklh

1. A more accurate comparison would be to compare the number of experts who support the OV and who don't to the total create two percentages. Otherwise, we are only making assumptions. Not good stats, huh? And I know how much you "supposedly" endorse good science..snicker..

2. That was your statement, but you want me to find proof to back it up? Great. The new thing I learned is how to pick out BS from debunkers. Actually, nothing new..old hat

[bellijklh]

@muzicmaker2001

1. i don't think there is such a web-site. just like there is no website telling us what is the percentage of priests who believe in god. you can compare the number of scientists who support conspiracy theory with the total number of scientists in the u.s (you can find that number on the net).

2. i read it somewhere, i don't remember where, try to contact NIST, this would be good homework for you, read their report, you might learn something new.

[muzicmaker2001]

@bellijklh

BTW, I'm not a truther. I don't even know what a truther is, never been to any meetings, banquets or baseball games. I just have a brain. The evidence and cover-up speaks for themselves..even no planes at the WTC. For examples, simple physics, no real witnesses unrelated to the government or media and no verification of the wreckage.

[muzicmaker2001]

@bellijklh

Do me a a couple of favors to prove your not full of BS:

1. Post a website where specific names of experts (percentage of scientists??) are given showing support of the official version?

2. Post the reference where a electron microscope, XEDS, and DSC were used to study the WTC dust samples (as you stated).

[bellijklh]

@muzicmaker2001 we know what we saw. we saw two airplanes crashing into the wtc, live, you can't cover up something like that. it was nice to speak to a truther who doesn't scream "inside job you asshole" and stuff like that.

[bellijklh]

@muzicmaker2001 there is no other way to say it, but yes. questioning is good but i can assure you that in 20 years the truth movement will fade away like the wtc dust. the percentage of architects, engineers and pilots who question the official story is neglectable and the percentage of scientists is even smaller, there is good a reason for that. the no plane and controlled demolition theories are just too ridiculous and not backed with proofs.

[muzicmaker2001]

@bellijklh

A good clip if you really interested in science and a true investigation..but maybe he's also a truther? Look out! They're everywhere!!!

watch?v=JZNQq7XBLwc

[muzicmaker2001]

@bellijklh

Please post a reference where the WTC dust was analyzed thru eletron microscope, XEDS and DSC by NIST and their findings? Thanx

[muzicmaker2001]

@bellijklh

It seems that every scientist, architects, engineer, pilot, firefighter, etc that questions or challenges the OV is an alleged truther and his expertise is now tainted?

[muzicmaker2001]

@bellijklh

Well, its a good thing the paper had other authors, a peer review and the separate confirmation of the chips by Chemical Engineer Mark Basile, right?