Mark Wahlberg vs. 9/11

Mark Wahlberg may have insulted victims and survivors of 9/11, hwat do you think?

Selected Works of the Maoist Rebel for sale now:
http://lulu.com/spotlight/MaoistRebelNews

Follow me on Twitter
http://twitter.com/#!/MaoistRebelNews

Read more news at
http://maoistrebelnews.wordpress.com/

Live shows Saturday at 9pm EST broadcast on
http://www.blogtv.com/people/MaoistRebelNews

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• communist
• socialist
• opinion
• maoist
• rebel
• news
• Mark Wahlberg
• 911
• 9/11
• new york
• flight 93
• terrorism
• New York City

[ToothpickMcBrainy]

I forget you're a truther. That shit makes me sad MRN. You're doing yourself no favors buying into that pile of illogical malarkey.

[MaoistRebelNews2]

@ToothpickMcBrainy Sure 3 buildings collapse in on themselves 3 times in one day being struck on the outside.

[GodOfTheInternets]

@MaoistRebelNews2

Yeah, that is what happened! Such over-simplifications are ridiculous.

9/11 was done by Muslim terrorists, get over it.

[MaoistRebelNews2]

@GodOfTheInternets Over simplification? You prefer a temporary suspension of the law of physics?

[rorrt]

Im not a "9/11 Truther", what a stupid term, "Truther" anyway

I would just say, the twin towers collapsed due to the pancaking of floors, after steel was weakened after fires

As for WTC7...Have you seen the photographs of the Deutsche Bank Building? That had to be deconstructed due to major damage, and that building was further away then building 7.

There was a ton of debris.

But whatever keeps the "truthers" happy, when they are happy...Im happy, because i dont need to talk to them in person.

[LiveLongCommunism]

No one would believe this stupid inside job bullshit.

[GodOfTheInternets]

@MaoistRebelNews2

Which never occurred. Strawman.

[TheStig000]

@ZanzibarJose Why are you claiming that it was perfect? How much do you know about building demolition?

[TheStig000]

So you're gonna sit there and say that nobody could have changed what happened that day? And what you're also saying is that you'd sit there in your seat like a fucking pussy while the plane is being hijacked with box cutters?

[ToothpickMcBrainy]

@ZanzibarJose The buildings pancaked down, layer by falling layer,very nearly (but not perfectly) straight. That's a consequence of their design and how the weakness manifested itself as the fire raged and weakened more and more steel. I'll PM you a few links.

[ToothpickMcBrainy]

@ZanzibarJose Steel loses strength as it heats up. The fact that you think melting is required indicates a fair degree of ignorance.

[ZanzibarJose]

@ToothpickMcBrainy Save your lame attempts at humor. If the evidence scientifically proves incendiary collapse it would. But the principles of the event dont support the claim. The claim is fire from jet fuel melted the support beams and the buildings imploded under their own weight. Some of that could be reasonable but why the entire buildings collapsed in its own footprint and not one segment was left standing. Such a perfect calamity and the lack of randomness?

[ZanzibarJose]

@ToothpickMcBrainy You should read more reports. Ones pertaining the melting temperature of steel and the combustion temperature of jet fuel(none of which applied to Tower 7 but you can replace jet fuel with diesel fuel if you wish.) Then there are the structural issues of buildings constructed in dense NYC. A claim of mental illness is an ad-hominem attack. It would be better to consider your sources. Never has any steel structured building collapsed because of an internal fire.