FDR Lost speech new bill of rights

This speech was previously lost and now it's found again for everyone to watch

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• FDR
• Roosevelt
• Bill
• of
• Rights
• 2nd
• New
• Deal
• Liberal
• Lefty

[booley]

@SpitfireOFatj well while not all conservatives are so bad a great many do seem to suffer from cognitive dissonance.

They say they want to follow the constitution... but also want to ignore portions of it they don't like, even repeal some of it.

They say they love freedom... but would gladly take freedom from others.

They say they hate corporatism.. but somehow keep helping corporatism.

They say they fear gov.. but have gladly expanded gov power & ignore much of the abuse of that power.

[xexixk]

@olga2415 Wow what an intelligent argument. You've shown yourself for what you are a know nothing who has to respond w/ vulgarities. There's no law that forces any business, big or small, to hire the unqualified nor is their any law that has created a quota. Some compaines may institute a quota but they aren't required to do so. If that was the case minorities wouldn't still be under-represented in the higher paying professions. You're just a bigot trying to hide it w/ an intellectual veneer.

[chop98]

@xexixk Then the people need to understand that the government we have now is not for and by said people. If we are to reach that goal, we need to get rid of the corporation which poses as our government. FDR was part of it.

[xexixk]

@olga2415 Sorry hun but spouting a bunch of obscenties when someone politely disagrees with you doesn't make you "intellectually armed". You should seek psychiatric help to deal w/ your paranoia and delusions. BTW did you or any of your family members appear as extras in Deliverance?

[olga2415]

@xexixk Yep, I done landed me a reeeeal jerk! My exercise with futility is over. You two sound like a couple of shills for the establishment, and as usually you are intellectually unarmed and argueing for the same of argument. Nothing productive is served by exchanges that veer far off the initial issue. But what would you know about the issues? You're clearly not here to learn anything. This is why history repeats. There are too many of you at any one time on the planet.

[xexixk]

@chop98 What on earth are you talking about? There was once a difference between the two camps, today not so much. I simply want a gov that functions in the interest of the people and everyone in society to contribute fairly to the society from which we all benefit from by being members of that society.

[chop98]

@olga2415 Hey olga! Apparently you replied to the wrong one as that was directed a xexixk. Look it up.

[olga2415]

@chop98 Wow, another "erroneous assumer". There is no linguistic exchance on the planet that would do anyone any good when engaged with one such as you. You twist meaning too much. And you're a waste of good time. Goodby.

[chop98]

@xexixk I can see by the words you base your arguments on that you're stuck in right v. left mindset. It looks like you're a government baby. Obviously you think many should benefit from the work of the few. Sorry. It doesn't work like that.

[watgaanhieraan]

@gulbirk What are you kidding me a friend of mine told me you are not allowed to have more than a dozen people in the restaurant at a time, now if that is not a monopoly I dont know what is, the government does the big stuff and the peasants can trade as long they know their place and dont get to big and if you do get big we will tell how big you can get based on the benefit we can derive from your trade, classic monopoly. I wonder who came first Cuban statism or De Beers Limited.

[xexixk]

@olga2415 BTW how much of your free time do you spend waving the confederate flag around and listening to Dixie Land? Quite a bit I would imagine.