Both deal with how our brains have a quick, reflexive part that is the dominant response, and a slower, reflective part, that contains our abilities for rational thinking. However the latter is lazy and ruled by the fast, instinctive, belief-generating part. Both are brief and well written.
What we need to do is get a conservative to name 5 immoral acts that are happening today in secular society. After they do that, we can go back to the bible and remove all examples of that immoral behavior.
I suspect that we will be removing a significant percentage of the bible.
I always travel by volcano. What kind of parabola do you need to have in order for something to shoot that far? Would it necessarily be in outer space?
20:57 This is exactly why I find it laughable that athiests, whether they be outspoken on youtube or not, still try and debate with Shock. Unless you tracked the assclown down in real life and confronted him about his positions, it's never going to be a fair debate (not even really a debate at all), you're just giving him undue attention that accomplishes nothing.
Concordance keeps coming up with terrible definitions.
'You can't definitely prove that my computer wont float away'. That's a terrible definition. His understanding of the word of prove/verified/ etc isn't a practical definition.
What we need to do is get a conservative to name 5 immoral acts that are happening today in secular society. After they do that, we can go back to the bible and remove all examples of that immoral behavior.
I suspect that we will be removing a significant percentage of the bible.
MrOttopants 1 month ago
I always travel by volcano. What kind of parabola do you need to have in order for something to shoot that far? Would it necessarily be in outer space?
MrOttopants 1 month ago
@C0nc0rdance We can't, Christopher Hitchens just died. If ever there was a better writer to contribute to such a Bible.
daemonowner 1 month ago
20:57 This is exactly why I find it laughable that athiests, whether they be outspoken on youtube or not, still try and debate with Shock. Unless you tracked the assclown down in real life and confronted him about his positions, it's never going to be a fair debate (not even really a debate at all), you're just giving him undue attention that accomplishes nothing.
NativeAlternative 1 month ago
yeah shock did me too
Forserean 1 month ago
@O2BSoLucky he subbed you so he can follow you around and post garbage after you make a comment.
Shyhalu 1 month ago
I'm not a big Youtuber so I think ShockofGod is a weirdo for subbing to my channel. (I think I have 5 weirdo's subbed now!
How do you unsub someone subbed to your channel?
O2BSoLucky 1 month ago
@DimmedDiamond I believe you mean analogies and not definitions.
NintendoFreak1992 1 month ago in playlist Andy Thomson - 8 January 2012
Concordance keeps coming up with terrible definitions.
'You can't definitely prove that my computer wont float away'. That's a terrible definition. His understanding of the word of prove/verified/ etc isn't a practical definition.
DimmedDiamond 1 month ago
Dont be silly, the Koalas landed in water after their Inter continental flight.
This is why they no longer drink water directly, as they had enough from landing in it and having to swim to shore.
:P
Knightyme 1 month ago