Hitchens v Turek -Religion v Atheism (1 of 15)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
7,202
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • If god existed, he would make the cameraman tilt up a little so I can see the debaters face.

    Disclamer: If in the coming videos the camera is pointed a little higher, I will not be counting this as proof of the existence of god, merely the attention of the camera operator hs been caught with a gripping debate.

  • Turek seems a bit of a wanker.

see all

All Comments (41)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Spaced Time - I like your sense of humor - made me lol.

    I never tire of listening to Christopher Hitchens call a spade a spade.

  • @Hornadayfan Agreed.

  • Thank you for posting this, Ous114.

  • Turek is quite possibly the most annoying theist alive today.

  • This debate is an absolute massacre for the faithful. 

  • @grantpark In Australia a bit would mean a lot. Saying a bit of a wanker would mean a person not to be trusted at all!

  • Atheists don't have a burden of explaining shit about the universe. Even if we haven't the slightest idea about how the universe came to be or how human/various animal species came to exist, which we do, that still doesn't mean theists are allowed to say their invisible friend who talks to them did it.

    Well they can, but that doesn't really prove or change anything...

  • a bit of a wanker? A huge wanker with a lot of anger and attitude. Must feel if he does a poor job he will be denied a place in heaven. Very annoying in his delivery.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more