A Critique of Bob Jones' Life Science Textbook Part 4

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,314
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 7, 2009

Continuing the rebuttal

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 12 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Kabane52)

  • Stop riding the VenomXFang thing! I hear his name every video and it getting tired!

  • It's my stock opening.

  • That was very well presented. I wonder if you teacher would let you present this in you class.

  • This is an old textbook I have from a couple years ago when I was still a creationist.

Top Comments

  • Again, the creationist arguement is incredibly weak. We are reading far too much into their stories first of all. There should be a far more paramount question that invloves the earth as a whole very little. What about other planets? If God made the earth in six literal days then he must have made the other planets in our solar system in that same period. That would only be logical. Why is there nothing on them. In fact some are simply "gas giants" No life, certainly nothing in his image like us

  • Why did he take the trouble to create a bunch of planets with crazy weather and hostile conditions? Not just here either. There are planets orbiting other stars as well, acting as their sun. Hundreds of light years away. Why create them, again with horrific conditions where we could never live and worship him etc. They make ZERO sense.

Video Responses

see all

All Comments (60)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • are youu the voice of the comic book guy on the simpsons?

  • creatard emo central

  • Thank you, someone with some brains and that digs a little deeper into the flaws of these creationist arguments.

  • "wrong, evolution can not be tested with ether DNA nor fossils."

    Wrong. Fossils have to transition in a perticular way with perticular dates and fossil layers. You can't just plop two fossils that look transitional that are dated one after the other and call that good. It has to transition as predicted and possible by evolution.

    You can also do the same with DNA.

  • i love running k's :D

  • your so smart but dumb at the same time.

  • *sees ad for Joal Osteen*

    GASP!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more